1.
A city to be proud of
Investing in our city
An accessible, clean, and sustainable city
2.
A fair and inclusive
city
An inclusive and more equitable city
A city where people feel safe, included and welcome
Homes for everyone
3.
A healthy city where people
thrive
A better future for children and young people
Living and ageing well
4.
A responsive council with well-run
services
2.1
Council staff deliver hundreds of different services for residents,
businesses and visitors.
2.2
We conduct weddings, look after the seafront and downland, maintain
the transport network, and maintain the city’s parks and
green spaces. Services we must provide by law include education
services, children’s safeguarding, children’s and adult
social care support, waste collection and disposal, planning and
housing services, road maintenance, and library services.
2.3
In 2024/25 we are expecting to spend over £924 million
delivering services for the city. It therefore costs £2.5
million a day to run council services. We are committed to spending
this money as efficiently and economically as possible. The charts
below show the major areas of service where money is spent followed
by the primary sources of funding.


![[Figures in brackets denote changes from the previous year]]($20250219120818_030182_0095733_MediumTermFinancialStrategy202526to202829.docx_files/image004.png)

3.1
The period covered in this strategy represents a challenging time
for local authority finances, with inherent uncertainty in the
financial planning process and significant ongoing forecast
increases in demand for key services. The potentially far-reaching
implications of the English Devolution White Paper also introduces
significant uncertainty with regard to the future of current local
authority organisations and structures across the County and for
the City. However, setting out clear financial plans remains
important in the interim and will help with any transition to new
models of local government for the area.
3.9
However, budget shortfalls are expected to continue to grow over
the medium term, based on current projections, to the order of
£44.539m over the remainder of the MTFS period. The Council
recognises that tackling this gap will require a medium-term focus
and investment in transformation and change to both improve
services and ensure they are as efficient and economic as possible.
Although delivering the proposed savings for 2025/26 will be
challenging, the process of driving transformation and change for
future financial sustainability must not be overlooked and must be
initiated now.
3.11
The budget setting and medium-term planning process is made up of
four primary requirements as follows:
·
The Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) – this
provides high-level spending and funding estimates, assumptions and
proposals over a 4-year planning period at a strategic or programme
level.
·
The Annual Budget and Council Tax – it is a legal
requirement to set a balanced budget and Council Tax each year,
funded by taxation, government grants, retained business rates and
fees, charges and commercial rents.
·
The Capital Investment Programme – this is a rolling
5-year investment programme for the construction, acquisition or
improvement of capital assets in support of Council Plan
priorities, primarily funded by capital grants, capital receipts,
or borrowing.
·
The Transformation Fund – a fund that utilises capital
receipts from the disposal of capital assets to fund one-off
revenue costs to support change and transformation. Using capital
receipt proceeds to fund revenue costs (e.g. staffing) is not
normally allowable but the government have provided ‘capital
receipt flexibilities’ until 2030 provided the use of any
capital receipts underpins efficiencies and future revenue
savings.

The components are described
below:
Review of Capital Programme Alignment &
Affordability
3.13
The council’s capital programme was substantially reviewed
last year to improve alignment with Council Plan priorities. A
number of schemes were decommitted, resulting in reduced capital
financing costs. This process will continue, advised by an officer
Capital Programme Board, to further improve alignment with
priorities, continue to assess affordability, and consider
opportunities to invest in new schemes that will support the
Council Plan.
Capital Financing Review
3.14
Linked to the Capital Programme review above, the associated
Capital Financing budget will also be reviewed given the
significant revenue implications. The current capital investment
plans will see very substantial capital financing costs start to
flow from 2025/26 in the form of Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP)
charges for schemes supported by borrowing. Where schemes do not
support Council Plan priorities they should therefore be
decommitted or reduced as far as practicable to reduce pressures on
the revenue budget.
Development of Invest-to-Save Business
Cases
3.15
There are many potential options that can be explored to improve
longer term financial sustainability. Everything from investing in
prevention to reduce longer term social care costs, to developing
new income sources, to redesigning care pathways, or insourcing or
outsourcing services. However, these can take significant capacity
and investment to bring to fruition and therefore need to be
properly assessed and evaluated before embarking on a whole host of
initiatives with questionable returns on investment. They are also
likely to need one-off investment through a Transformation Fund
(see later). The council has developed Outline Business Case (OBC)
templates to capture investment requirements where these can
demonstrate a return on investment.
Income Generation and Commercialisation
Strategy
3.16
Many fees & charges are regulated and in general fees &
charges are set to recover costs and overheads of the service
provided. However, in some areas the council has more discretion.
There are still many areas where the council does not charge but
could legally do so. A key concern with fees & charges is the
equality impact and impacts on those with low incomes. This can be
managed by designing the fee or charge to accommodate such impacts,
for example, introducing income thresholds. Many councils have
become increasingly reliant on fees & charges to protect
service provision due to the limitations on Council Tax increases
and reduced government grant funding. Approximately one third of
the council’s General Fund council services are now funded by
fees & charges. Further opportunities will continue to be
explored.
Applying Specific Productivity or Efficiency
Targets
3.17
Continually improving efficiency is good business practice for any
organisation. This can be achieved through continually reviewing
and improving processes (i.e. service redesign), using IT, digital
and AI technologies to automate workflows and on-line services, and
effective procurement, contract management and commissioning
strategies to utilise the council’s purchasing power to shape
local provision or secure more competitive terms. To recognise
this, some expenditure categories, e.g. supplies and services, can
be cash limited (i.e. provided with a lower or no inflationary
budget uplift or even reduced) or services can be targeted with
generic efficiency targets (e.g. percentage cost reduction or
staffing turnover targets) to ensure that all areas of the council
strive for improved value for money. The MTFS includes a number of
programmes to improve productivity and efficiency.
Exploring Fundraising Opportunities
3.18
The council has been successful over many years in bidding for
additional revenue and capital funding including Heritage Lottery
funds, Arts Council Funds, Homelessness and Rough Sleeping (RSI)
funding, Levelling Up funding, Family Hub funding, Department for
Transport funding (e.g. the substantial Bus Partnership bid),
Shared Prosperity Funding and so on. However, there may be other
opportunities available to the council to attract funding or even
to explore changing the funder of some services.
VFM Reviews
3.19
The council has a Best Value duty under the LG Act 1999 requiring
it to ‘make arrangements to secure continuous improvement in
the way in which its functions are exercised, having regard to a
combination of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.’ This
is generally referred to as improving Value for Money (VFM). There
are many ways to test and assure the value for money of services
provided by the council including:
·
Comparing the cost and quality of services with similar authorities
or service providers;
·
Using external, independent peer challenge to help identify
improvements e.g. LGA peer reviews. The LGA is currently assisting
with identification of best practice around homelessness solutions,
adult social care benchmarking and effective Public Health grant
usage;
·
Engaging expert consultancy to help identify and design specific
services or interventions to help improve VFM;
·
Comparing the cost and quality of in-house provision versus
contracted or outsourced provision (so-called ‘make or
buy’ reviews).
Transformation Fund
3.20
Transformation funding is discussed later and is supported by the
government’s ‘capital receipt flexibilities’
enabling capital receipts to be used to fund revenue expenditure
provided such expenditure supports improved value for money and
future revenue savings. These flexibilities have been extended to
March 2030, however, the demand on capital receipts across a range
of objectives is such that they may not provide sufficient
resources, and alternative financing may need to be considered
including:
·
Where a clear return on investment can be demonstrated over a
reasonable time period (max 5 years), this could potentially be
supported by internally borrowing from reserves with subsequent
repayment (subject to availability of reserves);
·
Alternatively, investment requirements can be netted off against
savings proposals, meaning that the saving in the first year or
more is reduced but then increases to its full extent in later
years once the initial investment is repaid, or;
·
If any element of the invest-to-save/transformation proposal is of
a capital nature, borrowing could be considered, provided that a
return on investment can be evidenced in the business case.
Star Chamber Reviews of Proposals
3.21
Star Chambers are common practice across business and local
authorities and are effectively a form of internal peer review.
They can involve both officers and members as desired. Star
Chambers are used to fully test delivery risks, review the capacity
required to achieve change, understand cumulative impacts on
equalities and consider any cross-cutting impacts on other council
services. Most importantly, they also ensure that proposals are
aligned with Council Plan priorities as far as practicably possible
within the finite resources available.
4.1
As noted above, the council provides hundreds of services across
the city. This requires significant organisation and management of
a wide range of resources and assets, as well as monitoring the
performance of contracted and commissioned services. The council is
therefore structured into 3 major corporate directorates headed by
a Corporate Director with the objective of working together as one
council. The authority and its directorates are supported by
corporate support functions including finance, legal, HR, IT&D
and other functions.
4.2
This section provides information about the major corporate
directorates and the service strategies they are putting in place
over the medium term to support the achievement of the Council Plan
priorities set out in Section 1. The strategies also provide
high-level information about the services provided together with
identification of the areas for potential savings and efficiencies
as well as plans for investment and transformation to achieve
continuous improvement and longer term financial
sustainability.
Supporting a
Better Brighton & Hove for All
5.1
The Families, Children and Wellbeing Directorate brings together
different services for children and families including education
and learning, family help and protection, libraries, community
safety, Public Health and support for skills and employment. Much
of the education and special educational needs provision is funded
through the ring-fenced Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG). This budget
strategy is focused on General Fund spend.
5.2
The main area of General Fund spend relates to the placement costs
for children and young people in care. Spend on children’s
placements is under pressure given the national placement
sufficiency issues. There is a national shortage of both foster
care placements and residential provision. This has resulted
in children being placed in provision based on availability rather
than need, often times at an inflated cost.
5.3
Nationally the number of children with child protection plans and
children being brought into care has reduced slightly over the past
12 months. Over recent years the numbers in Brighton & Hove
have been reducing in the context of national rises. During 2023
there was a slight decrease in the number of children subject to a
child protection plan locally. The number of children in care,
excluding unaccompanied asylum-seeking children, has continued to
decrease, although the complexity of need has increased.
5.4
There has been a concerning increase in the number of children and
young people experiencing emotional health and wellbeing
difficulties post pandemic and this together with an increase in
the number of children with disabilities and complex needs
requiring special residential provision is placing huge pressure on
budgets. Both locally and nationally, there has been an increase in
the number of adolescents requiring intensive support due to the
vulnerability to exploitation in all its forms.
5.5
Our vision is for a Directorate that is ambitious and committed to
working with others to provide services and support that provide a
better Brighton and Hove for all. We want to support Brighton and
Hove to be a healthy city, where people thrive; where children,
young people and families have a better future. We are
committed to operating as One Council, working together and across
to both improve outcomes and reduce costs. Inevitably, this
will require difficult decisions in balancing untargeted,
non-statutory support with preventative, statutory and safeguarding
provision.
About the
Services
5.6
There are four key branches in the directorate as follows:
Education and Learning
This service area includes:
·
School Organisation and Access to Education and Hidden
Children.
·
Education Standards and Achievement.
·
Virtual School for children in care and those previously in
care.
·
Ethnic Minority Achievement Service and Traveller Education
Service.
·
Inclusion Support Services for Schools including Education
Psychology services and Schools Wellbeing services.
·
Special Educational Needs services.
·
Nurseries and Early Years.
Family Help and Protection
This service area includes:
·
Fostering, family placement and permanence services.
·
Family Help and Protection services for children in need and those
in need of protection.
·
Specialist Community Disability services for 0-25 in including
respite and short breaks provision.
·
Children in care and leaving care services.
·
Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children services.
·
Specialist Adolescence and youth justice services.
·
Front Door for Families which includes the MASH (Multi Agency
Safeguarding Hub).
·
Multi-disciplinary Partners in Change Hub.
·
Contact and Family Group Conference Services.
Commissioning and Communities
This service area includes:
·
Commissioning services including Children’s placements; Home
to School Transport.
·
Community Safety and Prevent.
·
Libraries and customer.
·
Children’s Safeguarding and Performance.
·
Adult Education, Employment and Skills.
·
Third Sector commissioning.
Public Health
This service area includes:
·
Starting Well and Healthy Child Programme (0-19).
·
Mental Health and Suicide Prevention.
·
Drug and Alcohol treatment and recovery.
·
Sexual Health.
·
Healthy Lifestyles.
·
Health Protection.
·
Aging Well.
Supporting the
Council’s Priorities
5.7
Below is a summary of work we have planned over the next four years
that supports the priorities set out in the Council Plan:
A City to be Proud of
·
Develop the use of our libraries to improve access to council
services.
A Fair and Inclusive City
·
Deliver the Community Safety Partnership strategy.
·
Implement the Combatting Drugs Strategy.
·
Implement our City of Sanctuary action plan.
·
Support schools in delivering equalities curriculums, including
anti-racist education.
·
Implement the Violence Against Women and Girls, Sexual and Domestic
Abuse strategy.
·
Support the Community and Voluntary Sector through the delivery of
the grants programme.
A Healthy City where people Thrive
·
Keep children and young people safe, ensuring no child or family is
left behind and deliver our Corporate Parenting Strategy.
·
Develop our prevention and family support work including delivering
the government’s reforms of children’s social
care.
·
Support the provision of high quality and inclusive education from
early years through to adult learning.
·
Work with partners to deliver ambitious employment, training and
apprenticeship opportunities.
·
Deliver the SEND Strategy and support inclusive education across
the city’s schools.
·
Improve the mental and physical health of children through the
Healthy Child Programme and schools’ wellbeing service.
·
Enable people to live healthy and happy lives through the reduction
of harm through the use of tobacco, alcohol and drugs.
·
Help people be physically active and promote good mental health,
reducing the risk of suicide.
A Responsive Council with Well-Run
Services
·
Meeting the needs of our residents and other customers through an
improved customer offer.
Medium Term Budget
Strategy
5.8
We will work collaboratively within and across all directorates and
with key partners to deliver safe and whole family services which
focus on prevention, improving outcomes for all and provide value
for money. We are committed to delivering inclusive and
accessible provision.
5.9
To achieve this, we will:
·
Work across the directorate and wider council to provide efficient,
high-quality services that meet need and provide value for
money.
·
Explore opportunities to deliver services in partnership with
others on both a Sussex and South-East regional basis.
·
Commission services that meet statutory duties whilst supporting
the delivery of a better Brighton and Hove for all, ensuring
effective contract management is place.
Transforming
Services and Managing Demands
5.10
The directorate has reviewed all the services it delivers,
identifying those that are essential and making efficiency savings
wherever possible. Essential services include those that are
statutory, those where a business case demonstrates the service is
the best use of resources and those that generate income for the
council.
5.11
The children’s social care reforms due to be outlined
in the forthcoming Children’s Wellbeing & Schools Bill
will have a significant impact upon how family help and protection
is delivered in the city from 2026. This will be an
opportunity to expand the scope of our Family Hubs and build upon
our outstanding children’s social work services, meeting need
at earlier point and thereby avoiding escalation into more costly
interventions. The Children’s Safeguarding Partnership has
developed a partnership model of practice and the Right Support,
Right Time continuum of need – it is anticipated these will
support family help being provided at the earliest point, thereby
reducing escalation into statutory services.
5.12
The council is part of the Department for Education Regional
Care Co-operative pilot, a partnership of 18 local authorities
across the south-east who have committed to work together to
through a joint commissioning and procurement approach to shape the
children’s placement market. It is anticipated this
joint working and commissioning power will address sufficiency
issues, resulting in the right placements for children being
available at a cost that reflects market value as opposed to
availability.
5.13
There are a number of savings that have been proposed in order to
support the council’s overall financial position. These
include
·
a reduction in library opening hours;
·
a reduction in the employability service;
·
a reduction in social work resources.
Investment in
Services
5.14
The following investment in services is planned to meet demographic
and other cost increases to maintain investment in priority
services and meet statutory requirements:
·
Support for Children in Care.
·
Home to School Transport.
·
Support for Children with Disabilities.
·
Schools PFI Contract.
·
Support for Family Hubs.
5.15
This investment will ensure the council is able to meet its
statutory obligations to keep children safe, promote the education
of children with SEND and support the development of a healthy city
where people thrive.
Supporting a
Better Brighton & Hove for All
6.1
The Homes and Adult Social Care directorate is a newly formed
directorate since 1 January 2025. The directorate primarily
contributes to the council priorities of being a fair and inclusive
city, a healthy city where residents thrive and providing
responsive and well-run services. Both Adult Social Care and
Housing has seen regulatory inspections and ratings being
re-introduced by the Care Quality Commission (for Adult Social
Care) and the Regulator for Social Housing and Building Safety
Regulator for Housing (for Housing).
About the
Services
6.2
The Homes and Adult Social Care directorate consists of Housing and
Adult Social Care services.
Housing services include:
·
Council housing landlord services comprising:
o Tenancy Services, including the Travellers
Service;
o Housing Repairs & Maintenance;
o Housing Investment & Asset
Management;
o Increasing the supply of homes in the
city
·
Regulating the quality of private sector housing.
·
Providing temporary and emergency accommodation
(homelessness).
·
Providing supported accommodation.
·
Managing the Housing Register and Allocations Policy.
Adult Social Care services include:
·
Services for vulnerable adults with Care Act eligible needs
including:
o Assessment and Commissioning
Services.
o Carelink Out of Hours Services.
o Support for Older people including those with
memory or cognition conditions;
o Support for physical and sensory
disabilities;
o Mental health services in partnership with
Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust;
o Services for adults with learning disability and
autism from 25 years;
o Support for carers and all ancillary
activities.
·
Note, services for adults with learning disability and autism up to
25 years old continue to be delivered through the Families,
Children and Wellbeing Directorate, with delegated powers within
that Directorate for budget spend for this cohort. However, the
whole budget for all adult social care services, including adults
with a learning disability are within scope of this strategy.
Supporting the
Council’s Priorities
A city to be proud of
·
Through the Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy, Adult Learning
Disability Strategy, Autism Strategy, and our contribution to the
Accessible City Strategy, we are supporting people to have improved
lives and access to the city.
·
Our commissioning always considers how we can be more sustainable
and contribute towards carbon net zero. We also aim to maximise
social value through our commissioning.
·
Continue to develop strategies and business cases to provide
genuinely affordable homes.
·
Urgently address building safety and regulatory issues with clear
action plans and appropriate resourcing.
·
Increase participation in civic and community life through
neighbourhood engagement and participatory strategies.
A Fair and Inclusive City
·
Reducing health inequalities is at the heart of our Joint Health
and Wellbeing Strategy and one of the key priorities of Improving
Lives, the Sussex wide Health and Care strategy.
·
We are working with the city to develop more age and dementia
friendly spaces and developing our combatting drugs strategy with
Public Health.
·
Through the Safeguarding Adults Board we are looking to
continuously improve how we work across multiple agencies in the
city to protect those most vulnerable to harm and abuse.
·
Improve council housing quality and sustainability through Housing
Revenue Account (HRA) investment and make better use of existing
housing capacity to meet different housing needs.
A Healthy City Where People Thrive
·
Activities Work and Learning is a priority within the Adult
Learning Disability Strategy.
·
Improve private rented housing quality and sustainability through
closer working and oversight of landlords.
·
Reduce homelessness and rough sleeping through our preventative
approach and increased housing supply.
A Responsive Council with Well Run
Services
·
We work with partners across the city to focus on the health and
wellbeing of our residents. Through meticulous budget management
and good governance, we aim to have resilient, safe, and effective
services fit for the future.
·
Improve customer contact systems throughout the service and provide
more accessible information on key services for residents.
·
Ensure equalities data is monitored and informs service
improvement.
Medium Term Budget
Strategy
6.3
The budget strategy seeks to ensure that we deliver good quality
housing, good experiences when seeking housing or advice about
housing as well as adult social care services that promote
independence, keep people safe, and prevents the need to visit
acute health settings. These delivery intentions are
supported by investments and proposals of savings and mitigation
against the context of increasing demand, increasing complexity,
and increasing costs.
6.4
The strategy will require collaborative working across the
Integrated Care System with NHS Sussex and joint management of
provider sufficiency. Effective management of hospital discharge
will be key to avoiding increased acuity and need for social
care.
6.5
Across the Homes division, ensuring effective use of the Homeless
Prevention Grant in tandem with the council’s objective of
significantly increase housing supply is key to managing and
preventing future demand and costs. A wide range of options and
incentives to landlords and tenants are being explored and are
covered in the MTFS to use every possible method of meeting demands
until supply can be improved.
Transforming
Services and Managing Demands
Homes:
6.6
The demand for, and cost of, temporary accommodation together with
the increasing complexity of need amongst those living in temporary
accommodation remains the challenge for the General Fund budget of
the directorate. It is hoped that the new allocations policy,
taking a more holistic approach to finding properties that supports
residents to reconnect with family or friends who may live in
places other than the city, will help to manage demands.
Other saving and mitigation proposals include increasing our
housing stock through a new wholly council-owned company as well as
continuing the work of the joint venture with Hyde Housing.
6.7
The HRA budget aims to balance the priorities of the council and
its tenants and leaseholders and reflects a range of council
policies and programmes on customer service, repairs and planned
maintenance, capital investment in housing and engagement. There
are no savings required in the HRA overall, however budget
pressures, in particular activities such as building health and
safety compliance works, means there will be impacts on other areas
of the budget in the medium term.
Adult Social Care:
6.8
The demand for services continues to grow and the complexity of
need continues to increase due the continued advances in medicine
and people living longer with limiting conditions. These
challenges mean that the saving proposals are focused on managing
demand by triaging referrals so that those who are not eligible for
adult social care services are referred to organisations that can
help with their identified needs; ensuring that annual reviews of
service users take place so that care packages are appropriately
designed to meet the current needs of residents as well as managing
the annual price reviews of providers whilst finding ways to
support the care workforce.
6.9
Over the last two or three decades, the funding of Adult Social
Care has attracted a lot of debate. The Care Act had two
parts: the first related to national minimum standards of
expectations and this has been in force since 2014; the second is
related to funding; ten years on and this has not been
enacted. Meanwhile, the demand for services and the
complexity of need continues to grow. Within the context of
increasing demand and acuity of need, the council must deliver
services within finite resources and therefore when determining the
provision of services to meet need, it must do so in the most
cost-effective way possible.
6.10
Brighton and Hove has a diverse range of providers – in-house
services, not for profit providers and for-profit providers (the
latter two types of providers are known as the private and
independent sector). In commissioning to meet need and
delivering best value, the council will provide services where the
private and independent sector cannot deliver or is no more cost
effective than the council; where the independent sector can
support residents with good quality care at a more cost-effective
cost than the council then in order to meet needs within the
budget, the council will commission providers in the independent
sector. This will see a considerable change in the mix of provision
over the medium term.
Investment in
Services
6.11
Over the 4-years, estimated cost and demand pressures of over
£31million are projected across Adult Social Care services.
This is in addition to provision for real terms uplifts (inflation
provision) of around £16 million. Based on expected increases
in Core Spending Power for local authorities of between 2% and 3%
over the medium term, these costs would put the authority into
financial deficit without clear plans to address costs. Adult
Social Care will contribute to this effort but will need to ensure
statutory duties are met.
6.12
Homelessness costs have been increasing significantly since the
pandemic with only some of this being matched by increased Homeless
Prevention Grant and Rough Sleeping Grants. The MTFS provides for
approximately £4 million investment but as noted above, this
will outstrip expected financial settlements and will therefore
need to be mitigated by the transformation and savings proposals
set out in the MTFS.
Supporting a
Better Brighton & Hove for All
7.1
City Operations’ focus is on making the city a vibrant place
where people want to live, visit and do business, and where the
unique character of Brighton and Hove is celebrated and enhanced.
This includes making the city an accessible and sustainable place
where people are well-connected and can enjoy an attractive,
well-maintained built and natural environment.
7.2
The focus during 2025/26 is driving the city’s progress
towards achieving net zero carbon by 2030 and working with partners
to create the right conditions for a prosperous Brighton and Hove
by supporting investment. Our focus will be on providing reliable,
well-run services to the public, as well as protecting and
regenerating key assets, and generating key sources of income for
the authority. We will support the ambitions of the directorate to
preserve the city’s resources for future generations and
promote pride in place. This is achieved through delivering the
services detailed below.
About the
Services
Place
7.3
Place leads on place-making and many of the council’s built
environment functions. The service shapes development in the city
through the statutory plan making process, development management
and building control to ensure good urban design and protection of
heritage, as well as compliance with building regulations to ensure
safety. Driving the city’s progress towards net zero , the
focus is on delivery of high impact projects to address the effects
of climate change and sustainable development.
7.4
The Place directorate also shapes the city through its major
regeneration programme and investment in major projects, including
development of new affordable homes through the Homes for Brighton
& Hove joint venture and New Homes for Neighbourhoods
Programme. The team includes the council’s in-house
Architecture and Design service and has a focus on creating better
buildings and public spaces which are more climate resilient.
City Infrastructure
Transport
7.5
City Infrastructure develops clear plans to address the
city’s current and future transport needs, working closely
with Transport for The South East (TfSE) and other transport
partners to deliver major highway infrastructure projects on key
travel routes, such as Valley Gardens. A key priority is to
maintain and improve the city’s transport network to
transform user experience, increase resilience and extend the life
of key highway assets, including managing the risks posed by
flooding and protecting coastal highway structures. The service also ensures the city keeps moving
through regulating road use, managing on-street and off-street
parking and ensuring that all works are coordinated on the
highway. Influencing people’s travel choices to reduce
congestion and support improvements in air quality is also an
important focus, providing sustainable transport options including
enhancements in public transport, walking and cycling schemes,
concessionary travel and an electric vehicle charging network.
Regulatory
Services
7.6
Regulatory Services provides a broad range of
services including Food Safety, Environmental Protection, Health
& Safety, Licensing, Trading Standards and Animal
Licensing.
7.7
The budget is linked to statutory functions to
provide a wide range of Environmental health and regulatory
services which protect public health.
7.8
Some areas of regulatory services, such as Food
Safety continue to address the backlog of work arising from the
pandemic and the focus is on more innovative and efficient methods
of working whilst both catching up on the work delayed and
continuing to provide the full range of statutory functions as
required by the council.
Environmental Services
7.9
Environmental Services delivers recycling, refuse and street
cleansing services to improve the cleanliness of the city and meet
the council’s environmental obligations. This includes traded
commercial, bulky and garden waste services to residents and
businesses across the city. Through delivery of the Fleet Strategy
the service is leading the decarbonisation of council vehicles and
ensures they are well maintained and legally compliant.
Culture & Environment
7.10
Culture & Environment
manages the city’s visitor economy assets
including the Brighton Centre, parks and the seafront to
ensure the city remains a leading national and international
visitor destination. It oversees
an annual programme of varied and inclusive major outdoor events
and community events to promote the city, and manages major contracts with key culture providers,
including the Royal Pavilion Museums Trust and Brighton Dome &
Brighton Festival, to ensure they have a diverse reach and
contribute to the city’s economic ambitions.
7.11
The service also leads the delivery of the council’s ten-year
plan for revitalising sports facilities and manages contracts with
the RNLI for the seasonal beach lifeguards service, leisure
contract, and investments in key leisure assets, including
the new Hove Beach Park.
Supporting artists and creative business in the city to flourish is
a key role of the service, leading on research and strategic
growth initiatives , making the case for culture at risk, securing
investment for public art initiatives, making the case for
investment in culture, heritage and the creative industries and
facilitating inclusive communication.
7.12
The service is responsible for managing and conserving every park
and green open spaces. We have mapped all our rights of way
to ensure we can manage our assets effectively. We plan to
roll this out to all our green spaces as well as to develop a
creative approach to rights of way through our urban environment,
flagging more green arteries. Our work includes the delivery
of the Open Spaces Strategy, Stanmer Park Masterplan, management of
the city’s allotments/cemeteries, and managing and protecting
tree stocks.
7.13
The service leads the delivery of the council’s 10-year
strategic plan for revitalising and investing in sports facilities,
including sports centres, playgrounds, outdoor gyms, pavilions and
pitches. It manages major contracts with the RNLI , Freedom
Leisure, and investments in key leisure assets such as Hove Beach
Park.
IT & Digital (a partnership service)
7.14
The IT & Digital (IT&D) service is an in-house function
working in partnership with East Sussex County Council and Surrey
County Council. The partnership provides economies of scope and
scale and a shared leadership structure for the IT and Digital
service. The service seeks to enable the council to deliver its
operational and strategic priorities through technology,
information, and collective expertise. IT & Digital helps
people to connect, collaborate and work efficiently from wherever
they need to be to get the job done. The end-to-end IT
services cover Information to Infrastructure and everything in
between. Enabling innovation through digital and data projects and
ensuring the technology infrastructure foundations and compliance
regimes are in place. Some specific features of the service are
provided below:
Supporting the
Council’s Priorities
7.15
Below is a summary of work we have planned over the next four years
that supports the priorities set out in the Council Plan.
A City to be Proud of
·
Develop Brighton & Hove as a place where people want to live,
work, and learn.
·
Grow a diverse and sustainable city economy.
·
Promote and protect what makes Brighton & Hove unique.
·
Keep our city clean and manage waste including introduction of a
new food waste collection service.
·
Work towards carbon net zero.
·
Protect and enhance the city’s natural environment.
·
Make it easier for people to move around the city through network
management, our Bus Partnership and other initiatives such as Park
& Ride.
A Fair and Inclusive City
·
Create safe public spaces that are accessible for all.
·
Support Homes for everyone by increasing supply through Homes for
Neighbourhoods, Joint Venture programmes and other regeneration
programmes.
A Healthy City where people Thrive
·
Support the provision of high quality and inclusive education from
early years through to adult learning.
A Responsive Council with Well-Run
Services
·
Enable the successful delivery of digital improvement projects and
programmes through the co-design and co-delivery of underpinning
technologies, platforms and services in IT&D to support
services in delivering corporate priorities.
·
Develop a scalable and resilient IT&D technical architecture
which provides a secure, highly available platform for business
services.
·
Good governance and financial resilience.
Medium Term Budget
Strategy
7.16
City Operations fulfils a specific place making role for Brighton
and Hove, leading the city towards achieving net zero carbon,
building people’s pride in place and supporting the growth of
a diverse and resilient economy. Key directorate objectives for
2025/26 include:
·
Investing in a programme of high impact projects that will increase
the city’s resilience to, and address, climate change.
·
Working across the council and the city to support the transition
to a circular and more equitable economy.
·
Delivering key improvements to the council’s sports
facilities in line with the Sports Facilities and Investment
Plan.
·
Developing a new sustainable local Transport Plan for the
city.
·
Implementing progressive service changes as part of the City
Environmental Improvement Programme including a new Food Waste
Collection service and wider Collections Review.
·
Embedding a new Economic Growth Strategy for the city.
·
Progressing the city’s major regeneration and infrastructure
projects.
·
Working with Homes and Adult Social Care to deliver new council
homes and affordable homes through the New Homes for Neighbourhood
Programme and Homes for Brighton & Hove joint venture.
7.17
To ensure the directorate can achieve its objectives the budget
strategy focuses on reducing costs, maximising income and exploring
alternative service delivery models, in particular:
·
Delivering core services effectively and efficiently, pursuing all
opportunities for collaboration, innovation and streamlining
through improved use of technology, or bringing together areas of
work, skills and expertise.
·
Investing in services to modernise them for the future and ensuring
we continue delivering the best for our customers whilst reducing
running costs and lowering our carbon footprint, for example,
through continued electrification of our fleet.
·
Adopting a more entrepreneurial approach to secure new sources of
partnership funding and maximise existing income streams.
·
Making the best use of council assets, including leasing plus
disposing of premises where this is a viable option.
·
Reviewing standards of service and exploring new partnerships or
contractual arrangements to support service delivery, as well as
opportunities to have community-led services.
·
Supporting staff and their professional development to ensure the
directorate has a diverse, resilient workforce and one with the
relevant skills, knowledge and expertise to deliver its core
objectives.
Transforming
Services
7.18
City Operations has reviewed all the services it delivers
identifying opportunities to transform the service through savings
and efficiencies. These will be achieved through a mixture of
commercial approaches to generating income, service redesigns and
efficiencies, and changes in contractual arrangements.
7.19
Redesigning and increasing efficiencies in key business areas,
including City Clean, Culture and Environment, parking, planning
and sustainability. This involves reorganising staffing structures
to streamline decision making. Further savings from the removal of
vacant posts across Transport, City Parks, and Place Services will
enable these service areas to continue operating within a reduced
budget, whilst meeting council priorities.
7.20
Taking a more entrepreneurial approach to leisure and tourism
facilities and the sale of event and commercial activity space in
the city will increase revenues. Coupled with a review of the
council’s agreements with its cultural partners and options
to generate income from cultural consultancy in the planning
process, income will be bolstered.
7.21
Savings will also be made from ending services that are no longer
delivering a sufficient return and looking at opportunities to
transfer assets out of the council to partners or communities.
7.22
Digital Innovation will continue to review the services delivered
ensuring contracts are reviewed and reprocured, ensuring best value
is achieved and ensuring best working practices are implemented
across the council’s networks.
7.23
There are limited opportunities for Regulatory Services to make
savings; proposed budgets for 2025/26 will ensure services continue
following a redesign for the services provided.
7.24
As a result of decommitted and delayed spend on capital projects
the council’s capital programme will diminish, and budget
savings on consultancy and professional fees will follow.
Investment in
Services
7.25
A wide range of capital and revenue investments are planned across
City Operations to support the achievement of priorities and help
to deliver transformation and savings programmes as follows:
·
Investment of over £2 million capital funding and £1.2
million net revenue funding to introduce a new Food Waste
collection service for the city.
·
Long term capital investment to renew and strengthen the
infrastructure of the city will continue, to ensure effective
management of the highway network and improve air quality, along
with the delivery of major regeneration projects to bring about
quality new affordable housing and business space whilst generating
income from land and property assets and increasing business rate
and council tax returns.
·
Working with Homes & Adult Social Care to provide continued
investment in the development of new Council housing through the
New Homes for Neighbourhood Programme and new living wage rent
housing through the Homes for Brighton & Hove joint
venture.
·
Delivering major regeneration programmes to generate further
revenues each year in new council tax and business rates.
·
Investment in Seafront Infrastructure, including £12m
investment in the eastern seafront at Black Rock and progressing
the restoration of Madeira Terraces.
·
Implementation of the new 10-year Sports Facilities Investment
Plan, including progressing the delivery of a new Leisure Centre to
replace the King Alfred.
·
Delivery of £1.76m Shared Prosperity Funding to eligible
local businesses or communities to improve pride in place and level
up people's life chances. For 2025/26 SPF funds will support core
programmes and City Operations staffing.
·
Implementation of the City Downland Estate Plan with over 60
actions prioritised into a short, medium, and long-term programme
of projects, using natural capital and generating income.
·
Continued investment in the city’s cultural assets including
a new creative workspace plan in development to provide workspace
for the creative industries in the city and to deliver an income to
the council.
·
Delivery of the Royal Pavilion Estate Masterplan and £35m
capital investment programme.
·
Delivery of the Local Transport Plan capital programme to provide
integrated transport projects and a maintenance programme of
carriage and footway resurfacing works on the transport
network.
·
Continued investment in the city’s electric vehicle charging
network utilising government grant funding.
·
Continued investment in the Brighton Marina to River Adur coastal
protection scheme in partnership with other Authorities and with
significant investment from the Environment Agency.
·
Investment in the city’s playgrounds, parks and open spaces
including the Stanmer Park Master Plan restoration project.
·
Investment in the Fleet Strategy to progress the decarbonisation of
the council’s fleet.
·
Investment in the city’s tree collection to tackle the
impacts of elm disease and ash dieback.
·
£3m capital investment in the city’s public
toilets.
·
Continued investment in City Environment infrastructure and
operational sites to improve the working environment and impact on
the service’s carbon footprint.
·
Investment in business systems to improve service performance and
customer experience.
Supporting a
Better Brighton & Hove for All
8.1
The majority of the council’s Support Service Functions
(except IT&D) are headed up by the three corporate roles of the
Director of People & Innovation and two statutory directors,
the Director of Governance & Law (and Monitoring Officer)
and Director of Property & Finance (and S151 Chief Financial
Officer). However, some support services are managed in a
partnership with East Sussex and Surrey Council Councils including
Internal Audit & Counter Fraud and Procurement. A number of
front-line services are also managed within these directorships
including Electoral Services, Local Land Charges, Welfare Support,
Housing Benefit administration, and local tax collection and
administration.
8.2
The aim of all support service functions is to provide trusted,
efficient and expert support to the council to enable it to be a
responsive and well-run council. This includes providing good
quality customer services both internally and externally, and
providing the strategic planning, operational support, and
management information and insight to drive innovation and change
in support of delivering planned transformation and savings
programmes. Another key role is to ensure that the council
maintains strong governance and internal controls to manage public
resources effectively and to take safe, legally compliant decisions
and actions.
8.3
Support Service functions therefore operate as a ‘Strategic
Business Partner’ to the organisation and its service
directorates and support them through complex changes by being
involved in the development of options and their evaluation,
through to decision-making and supporting implementation.
About the
Services
8.4
The primary services provided by support service functions
include:
Cabinet Office
·
Plays a key role in developing, guiding and internally promoting
key strategies and acts as a liaison between the Administration and
officers to drive policy development and develop strategic
partnerships across the city.
Property, Finance and Internal Audit &
Counter Fraud
·
Provides strategic planning and management of the council’s
commercial and operational estates.
·
Finance, including the statutory Section 151 Chief Financial
Officer role, overseeing the delivery of the council’s annual
and medium term financial planning processes as well as a wide
range of financial advisory and statutory services.
·
Internal Audit & Counter Fraud (a partnership service) provides
wide ranging reviews of services and systems to ensure effective
internal controls and governance are in place and that fraud risks
are minimised.
People & Innovation including
Communications & Public Relations
·
Human Resources and Organisational Development provide advisory,
policy development and learning support services to the
organisation.
·
This area also includes Health & Safety advice and support for
all council services and schools together with building maintenance
and facilities management for all Corporate Landlord operational
buildings.
·
The Communications and Engagement service provides a public and
internal service that communicates information and other content
about the council, it’s decisions, policies, priorities and
services.
·
This area also provides a Programme Management Office to support
innovation and improvement and delivery of planned transformation
and savings proposals. Customer service improvement including the
management of complaints and compliments is also a responsibility
of this support service function.
IT & Digital (a Partnership Service)
·
See the City Operations Service Strategy.
Legal, Democratic and Electoral Services
·
Provides legal advice and representation across all of the
council’s functions as well as the statutory Monitoring
Officer function.
·
Provision of a legally compliant, democratic decision-making
process including the co-ordination of support to Members and all
Council Meetings including training & development and provision
of support for the council’s Scrutiny function.
·
Electoral Services provide end-to-end management of local elections
with a primary aim of delivering safe and compliant elections.
Procurement (a Partnership service)
·
Supports the development of procurement strategy and policies
including sustainability, Environmental, Social & Governance
strategy, social value and modern slavery.
·
Supports procurement of goods and services to the value of
approximately £300m per annum and manages and authorises
waivers of Contract Standing Orders.
Welfare, Revenues & Business Support
(WRBS)
·
Provision of strategic support and policy development for
responding to welfare reforms, as well as direct delivery of local
welfare support, assistance and advice.
·
Collection and recovery of Council Tax (and Council Tax Reduction
Scheme), Business Rates, Sundry and Corporate Debts.
·
Processing of Housing Benefit claims and managing the transfer to
Universal Credit.
·
Provision of Payroll Services to the council, schools and other
contracted organisations and processing of payments to the
council’s suppliers and providers (Accounts Payable).
·
Provision of banking, purchasing card and urgent payment
services.
·
Support for the development and management of major corporate
financial, HR and Payroll systems.
8.5
Many of the services above are also involved in providing a wide
range of traded or contracted services to schools, South Downs
National Park Authority, East Sussex Fire & Rescue, district
councils and others which generates significant incomes.
Supporting the
Council’s Priorities
8.6
Support Service Functions play a key role in facilitating other
services to deliver against the Council Plan priorities, including
the key aim of being a responsive council with well-run services at
both a strategic and operational level. Helping the council to
develop robust financial strategies, workforce plans, digital
customer strategies, conduct effective communication, engagement
and partnership working, develop robust and innovative policies,
and respond effectively to welfare reforms is critical to
maintaining sustainable, financially resilient and accessible
council services.
8.7
A key determinant of the demands placed on Support Service
Functions is therefore the level of change experienced across the
organisation. This has been and remains at very high levels due to
the cumulative effect of the growing financial challenges in local
government requiring ever greater innovation in everything from
digital services to corporate debt management to financing
strategies that help resources and services go further. This
creates a tension between the need to provide cost effective
support functions while ensuring that the council and its services
have the support to make sound business judgements and decisions
that minimise legal, financial, employment, equality, health &
safety, governance, internal control and other risks.
8.8
Support Service Functions underpin the authority’s governance
framework, ensuring safe and legally compliant decision-making, as
well as maintaining reviewing and improving the council’s
internal control environment. Advisory and Business Partnering
services within Finance, HR, IT&D and Procurement help the
organisation to maximise its use of resources, fully evaluate
options, avoid costly fines, mistakes or non-compliance
occurrences, and thereby deliver cashable and non-cashable savings
or cost-avoidance. Similarly, Programme Management and other
resources ensure effective oversight and delivery of major
improvement and innovation programmes funded by the Transformation
Fund or Capital Investment.
8.9
These services are integral to front line delivery and work best
when operating as a trusted Strategic Business Partner as part of
both corporate and directorate leadership teams’ roles in
developing strategic responses and solutions for delivery. They
also ensure collaborative ‘one council’ working across
the council by being able to share or link information to ensure a
holistic approach to policy or service development. Over the medium
term Support Service Functions aim to support council priorities
through:
A City to be Proud of
·
Supporting the development of underpinning policies, plans and
strategies, such as Devolution, Economic Strategy, and Poverty
Reduction.
·
Providing a key place-shaping role through effective communication
campaigns and channels including priority areas such as waste
minimisation, promoting sustainability, publicising and consulting
on regeneration and major developments, promoting cultural events
and city travel.
·
Providing support and oversight for the development of capital
investment strategies and the use of capital receipt flexibilities
to improve council services and invest in core infrastructure for
the city.
A Fair and Inclusive City
·
Continuing to develop a new approach to community engagement,
including our approach to digital engagement and consultation
– enabling a more agile approach to listening and
responding.
·
Reinvigorating collaborative working across the city to support
co-operation across city partnerships and drive positive
change.
·
Supporting the Poverty Reduction Steering Group to develop a more
sustainable, preventative, and holistic welfare response.
·
Oversight of the council’s Fair and Inclusive Action Plan
(FIAP) which supports the organisation to become reflective of the
community, and to improve the experience and diversity of all
staff, including embedding the council’s Anti-Racism Strategy
and approach in all council policies.
·
Embed policies and practice concerning Social Value, Community
Wealth Building, Sustainability and Modern Slavery across all
contracts.
A Healthy City where people Thrive
·
Supporting the development of the Employment and Skills Plan.
·
Providing key financial advice and support to enable School
Organisation changes including implications for the DSG, General
Fund and/or Capital Resources.
·
Ensuring effective legal support and advice to support safeguarding
and child protection including through decisions of the court.
·
Providing communications plans which are an essential part of
promoting health and wellbeing in the city and enabling behavioural
change.
A Responsive Council with Well-Run
Services
·
Proactively listening and responding to resident concerns through
increased use of digital channels of communication and engagement
to ensure the council becomes a learning organisation able to
continually improve services.
·
Driving improvement and innovation by martialling project and
programme management resources to support transformation and
savings programmes.
·
Enable the successful delivery of digital improvement projects and
programmes through the co-design and co-delivery of underpinning
technologies, platforms and services with IT&D to support
services in delivering corporate priorities.
·
Implementing the Corporate Systems Improvement (CSI) programme to
modernise corporate HR, Finance, Payroll and Procurement systems to
improve the integration of data, increase automation and efficiency
including through the use of emerging AI technologies, and improve
customer service.
·
Developing a people strategy designed to ensure we are a learning
organisation that has an engaged and motivated workforce who are
able to deliver their best to the city and enable all priorities to
be supported.
·
Supporting the organisation to ensure it fulfils its legal and
moral health & safety responsibilities to provide a safe
working environment where staff are supported to be happy and
well.
·
Through procurement, ensuring that the city council's spending
power is used to secure good value for money and, as far as
possible with contract regulations and market conditions, to
procure local services, and improve sustainability and social
value.
Medium Term Budget
Strategy
8.10
The directorate’s budget strategy will continue to adopt the
strategies below in an attempt to meet an increasing volume and
complexity of demands efficiently and effectively. However, this is
increasingly requiring effective demand management, which is
generally managed through prioritisation and risk
stratification.
8.11
Welfare, Revenues & Business Support has provided significant
welfare support, advice and signposting, including through the
Community Hub service which also supports the Homes for Ukrainians
programme. However, much of the support is funded by one-off
government grants and therefore the focus over the medium
term will shift to developing collaborative and preventative
strategies with other directorates and city partners rather than on
granting emergency or hardship provision which does not ultimately
provide long-term, sustainable solutions for low income
households.
8.12
All services continue to explore further opportunities for
collaboration, innovation and efficiency through improved use of
technology, closer working with other directorates to design
improved customer journeys and experience and exploring
opportunities to bring services or skills together. In particular,
the directorate will be key to supporting proposed
‘Organisational Redesign’ workstreams which will not
only focus on management layers and spans, and the deployment of
administrative roles, but will also examine common functional areas
across the council to explore possible rationalisation or
efficiencies, for example, commissioning and contracting functions
or project and programme management roles.
8.13
Similarly, continued implementation of systems developments,
automation and digital services will be undertaken to improve
customer service and deliver potential efficiencies, primarily
through the Corporate Systems Improvement programme.
8.14
Utilising and supporting external LGA peer challenge and reviews
(at corporate and service level) to assist the authority in
identifying strategic opportunities for improvement and financial
sustainability.
8.15
Development and delivery of an updated and revised Corporate Debt
Policy will provide for more effective pre-enforcement debt
prevention, advice and signposting that minimises the financial and
administrative costs of supporting financially vulnerable
households across all council services while maintaining collection
performance.
8.16
There will be a continued focus on maintaining and, where possible,
increasing external income streams including renewal of contracts
to existing customers including South Downs National Park and East
Sussex Fire & Rescue Service alongside the pursuit of new
income streams from other authorities. However, this must not be at
the expense of service quality to the council and its residents and
customers.
8.17
Recruiting new trainees, apprentices and internships to improve
succession planning and mitigate the longer term cost and challenge
of recruiting qualified professional staff which has become
increasingly challenging over the last few years.
Transforming
Services and Managing Demands
8.18
Supporting Devolution and Local Government Reorganisation:
The government’s English Devolution White Paper will have
far-reaching implications for provision of future local government
services. The council has bid to
join the priority programme and, whether admitted to this programme
or not, all Support Service Functions will inevitably be required
to support the planning process for change.
8.19
Welfare, Revenues & Business Support (WRBS): The
continued roll-out of the Universal Credit caseload to the DWP and
continued investment in digital customer developments and
automation are required to support the achievement of efficiencies
in this service which will accelerate over the next 4 years subject
to no further delays to the Universal Credit transfer.
8.20
Corporate Systems Improvement Programme: This major
programme aims to re-procure separate systems that are fit for
purpose (‘best of breed’) but to use them (re-install
them) in the way they were designed to be used (‘adopt not
adapt’) rather than tailoring them for unnecessarily complex
and superfluous local requirements. The data will be cleansed and
new technologies and modules will be used to link data across the
systems, automate as many processes as possible, improve the ease
of use of the systems and make reporting and decision-making
quicker.
8.21
Workspace Innovation Programme: This programme is an
extension of the previous workstyles approach aimed at
realigning the use of administrative buildings to support new ways
of working, providing increased collaboration, flexible and remote
working opportunities, delivering flexible and multi-purpose
spaces, and installing modern technologies for meetings and data
sharing. It will also aim to reduce the council’s occupancy
of administrative buildings to reduce costs and carbon
emissions.
8.22
A corporate disposal programme of operational and commercial
assets will also support the budget strategy. Reviewing the
council’s operational assets will continue to support changes
in service delivery across the council, reducing spend on running
costs, delivering potential capital receipts through the sale of
vacant properties, and rationalising the council’s corporate
offices. A review of commercial assets in conjunction with the One
Public Estate agenda, working with other public sector
organisations, will also release sites for regeneration or
comprehensive redevelopment.
Investment in
Services
Investment in Support Service Functions
will be through a mix of revenue, capital and Transformation Fund
resources as follows:
·
Capital investment for Phase 1 of the Corporate Systems Improvement
programme of £2.750m will be provided as approved by Cabinet
in November 2024.
·
There will be investment in project and programme management
support, the Workspace Innovation Programme, and additional HR and
Leadership Development support to drive innovation and change. This
will require minimum investment from the Transformation Fund of
£1 million per annum over the next 4 years as detailed
below.
·
There will also be necessary investment to cover the cost of the
new 5-year External Audit contract negotiated nationally by PSAA.
The cost has increased substantially (151%) in recognition of the
need to provide a more effective local authority audit regime and
address the substantial problem of audit backlogs.
·
More generally and where appropriate, support services will develop
invest-to-save business cases where these can help services to
improve customer satisfaction, improve efficiencies and/or achieve
future financial savings. Programmes aimed at reducing the cost of
agency staffing and absence management (sickness), achieving
economies through improved procurement and contract management, and
reducing Corporate Landlord (estates) costs are planned over the
medium term.
·
Investment into commercial property assets through the CAIF fund to
maintain assets and optimise income.
·
Investment in energy efficiency measures for the council’s
operational estate with further phases of the Solar PV and
decarbonisation programmes on the council’s corporate
buildings.
9.1
Local Government financial sustainability and medium term financial
planning has been severely hampered by delayed reforms to Local
Government funding and, in particular, six successive years of
1-year financial settlements. The current government has pledged to
introduce multi-year financial settlements next year which,
notwithstanding the impact of devolution and local government
reorganisation, is long overdue. Although there remains
considerable uncertainty, it is clear that national and local
finances will remain severely straitened over the medium term and
it is important to plan for this reality.
9.2
The council’s Medium Term Financial Strategy will therefore
adopt a prudent and realistic approach to financial planning but
will recognise that investment in transformation and change will be
critical to achieve longer term financial sustainability. The broad
principles adopted in development of the MTFS include:
·
A focus on ensuring that capital and revenue resources and
investment support Council Plan priorities;
·
Development of associated Service Strategies to link revenue,
capital and transformation plans and programmes across the
council;
·
Realistic, evidenced-based funding and inflationary assumptions
using government OBR forecasts where local evidence is not
available;
·
A balanced MTFS and balanced annual revenue budgets with only
planned drawdowns of reserves and balances;
·
A fully funded 5-Year Capital Investment Programme including
provision of a corporate Transformation Fund held centrally;
·
Regular reviews of reserves and the Working Balance to ensure
appropriate coverage for emerging risks and provision of
appropriate risk reserves and balances;
·
Budget envelopes (‘blocks’) set for each Corporate
Directorate and Support Service Functions to ensure delivery of
services within available resources;
·
An assessment of cost and demand pressures that are identified and
agreed as part of the MTFS to ensure scrutiny, ownership and
accountability;
·
Robust savings, efficiency and mitigation plans which are owned,
tracked, and monitored;
·
Identification and assessment of budget risks to ensure an
effective risk management and mitigation strategy;
·
Reviews of fees & charges to ensure all charges consider
commercialisation and current rates of inflation.
9.3
In the context of the provisional settlement and national economic
forecasts, this section sets out the key resource assumptions to be
adopted over the 4-year planning period. These will inevitably
change with expected longer-term settlements and any change in the
structure of Local Government funding and financing including
Council Tax referendum principles.
Council Tax increases and Tax base
Changes
9.4
Current Council Tax referendum principles, as set out in the Local
Government Finance Policy Statement, are assumed to apply until
further notice, which currently allows for a 2.99% annual increase
to Council Tax and a 2% Adult Social Care precept. The assumption
regarding the latter is that either precepts will continue to be
allowable or, if not, that the equivalent in additional social care
grants will be provided given the severe and ongoing increase in
cost and demand for social care services.
9.5
Tax base growth estimates are based partly on historic trends and
partly on known and expected housing developments over the next few
years. Note that no changes to the Working Age Council Tax
Reduction Scheme (CTRS) are assumed for the period while caseload
is projected to fall by 0.3% in 2025/26 and remain at this level
thereafter.
Council Tax
Assumptions
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
Council Tax
Increase
|
2.99%
|
2.99%
|
2.99%
|
2.99%
|
Adult Social
Care Precept
|
2.00%
|
2.00%
|
2.00%
|
2.00%
|
Tax base
increase (growth)
|
1.7%*
|
0.75%
|
0.75%
|
0.50%
|
Council Tax
Collection Rate
|
98.75%
|
98.75%
|
98.75%
|
98.75%
|
* Includes 0.8% from
introduction of the second homes premium from 1/4/25
An additional taxbase increase of
£0.250m per annum (approx. 0.1%) from 2026/27 is also assumed
to cover average under-estimates in recent years that can be
related to new or higher than estimated premia, higher than
estimated dwellings, or lower than estimated discounts including
Student Numbers, Single Person Discounts or Council Tax Reduction
caseload.
9.6
Potential risks and issues include:
·
Confirmation of the impact of Second Homes and increased empty
homes premiums;
·
Council Tax collection rates and bad debt provisions;
·
Delays in developments creating overstatement of CT taxbase;
·
Council Tax Reduction caseload numbers (dependent on economic
conditions).
Business Rates Increases and Tax base
9.7
The main changes to Business Rates announced in the Autumn
Statement 2024 included:
·
A freeze of the small business rate multiplier at 49.9p;
·
Government will compensate local authorities for the lost income
due to the freezing of multipliers through S31 compensation
grants;
·
An increase of the standard multiplier in line with CPI to 55.5p
per £1 rateable value;
·
The Retail, Hospitality and Leisure relief scheme will be extended
for one year for 2025/26 with the same eligibility but with a
reduced level of relief at 40%, and up to a cash cap of
£110,000 per business.
The council retains 49% of Business
Rates collected (1% is retained by East Sussex Fire Authority).
Business Rate Retention forecasts follow government OBR inflation
forecasts on the assumption that if government chooses to cap
increases or introduce new reliefs, councils are compensated
through Section 31 grants. BRR tax base growth is based on historic
trends for the city.
Business Rate
Assumptions
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
BRR CPI
Increase (OBR)
|
1.70%
|
1.60%
|
1.60%
|
2.00%
|
Tax base
increase
|
0.75%
|
0.75%
|
0.75%
|
0.75%
|
9.8
Potential risks and issues include:
·
The risk that appeals provisions could be understated requiring
additional one-off resources;
·
Empty property reliefs higher than normal due to economic
conditions;
·
Collection performance impacted by economic conditions and
prosperity.
Fees and Charges
9.9
Fees and charges budgets are assumed to increase by the standard
corporate inflation rate assumed in the MTFS. The MTFS assumption
sets a target uplift that includes a combination of economic
growth, ongoing commercialisation and generation of new incomes.
However, Penalty Charge Notices (parking fines) are excluded from
this increase as the levels of fines are set by government and
cannot be changed independently. Similarly, Temporary accommodation
income is assumed to increase by a lower amount (2.00%) to average
out historic changes to Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates.
Fees &
Charges Assumptions
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
General
increases
|
3.0%
|
3.0%
|
3.0%
|
2.5%
|
Parking Penalty
Charge Notices
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
Temporary
Accommodation
|
2.0%
|
2.0%
|
2.0%
|
2.0%
|
Government grants
Revenue Support Grant (RSG), Services Grant and
Recovery Grant
9.10
RSG is assumed to increase by September CPI inflation each year
(based on OBR inflation forecasts). For 2024/25, the increase in
RSG was funded by reducing the Services Grant and this has
continued in 2025/26 resulting in a net loss of resources of
£0.197m.
9.11
As noted, the Services Grant has been used to protect or fund
increases to other grants and has gradually reduced. The council
received £0.376m in 2024/25 (down from £2.392m in
2023/24) and will receive zero in 2025/26 and beyond.
9.12
The Autumn Budget included a new Recovery Grant with a national
total of £600m. This funding is allocated on the basis of the
Index of Multiple Deprivation combined with Council Tax income.
This council received no funding through this allocation with only
approximately half of Local Authorities receiving a Recovery Grant
allocation. The MTFS assumes there will be no grant in future.
General
Government Grants
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
RSG
(consolidated)
|
£8.789m
|
£8.932m
|
£9.078m
|
£9.258m
|
Services
Grant
|
£0
|
£0
|
£0
|
£0
|
Recovery
Grant
|
£0
|
£0
|
£0
|
£0
|
Total
|
£8.789m
|
£8.932m
|
£9.078m
|
£9.258m
|
Adult Social Care precepts and Better Care
Funding (BCF)
9.13
In recent years the government has provided additional resources to
support Adult Social Care (ASC) through a combination of increased
grant and ASC precepts. The government has stated it will not be
implementing the charging reforms set out by the previous
government that had been deferred to October 2025. No other
announcements have been made for future years. Through the Local
Government Finance Policy Statement the government have confirmed
that a 2% ASC precept is allowable for 2025/26 but for later years
this is less certain but the equivalent in ASC grant or alternative
support, for example through Local Government Funding Reform, is
assumed.
9.14
The table below shows how social care funding has grown in recent
years and the assumption remains that grants will eventually be
rolled into the local government finance settlement to become part
of the permanent funding base, however, no assumption of any future
inflationary increases has been made.
Social Care
Resources
|
2022/23
|
2023/24
|
2024/25
|
2025/26
|
ASC
Precept
|
1%
|
2%
|
2%
|
2%
|
Improved Better
Care Fund
|
£9.459m
|
£9.459m
|
£9.459m
|
£9.459m
|
Social Care
Grant
|
£10.815m
|
£17.856m
|
£23.535m
|
£23.535m
|
ASC Discharge
Grant
|
|
£1.326m
|
£2.210m
|
£2.210m
|
ASC Market
Sustainability & Improvement Fund and Workforce Fund
|
|
£4.746m
|
£5.375m
|
£5.375m
|
New Social Care
Grant 2025/26
|
|
|
|
£4.008m
|
Total
|
£20.274m
|
£33.387m
|
£40.579m
|
£44.587m
|
9.15
The figures above do not include resources generated by the ASC
precepts which are included in Council Tax assumptions. The 2%
precept in 2025/26 will generate additional taxation of
£3.756m.
9.16
Beyond 2025/26 funding for Adult Social Care is unknown. However,
the Local Government Association (LGA) and the Association of
Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) have presented a
substantial body of evidence to demonstrate how adult social care
costs will escalate over time with changing population
demographics. The government have not indicated a timeline for a
further review of the long-term funding of Adult Social Care but
some consideration of the funding impact on local authorities will
inevitably need to be made by government. As noted above, in lieu
of any detailed information, a prudential assumption of additional
Adult Social Care funding equivalent to a 2% Adult Social Care
precept is assumed in the MTFS projections from 2026/27 to
2028/29.
Children’s Services Grants
9.17
The government is providing £250 million of new funding
nationally for a new Children’s Social Care Prevention Grant.
This will be used to invest in the national rollout of Family Help
and is allocated according to estimated need for children’s
social care services in each authority area. The government also
confirmed that it is rolling other Children & Families grants
into a consolidated grant. This provides the same level of
resources as previously. No assumptions about future inflationary
uplifts of these grants are made in the MTFS.
Children &
Families Grants
|
2024/25
|
2025/26
|
Change
|
Children’s Social
Care Prevention Grant
|
n/a -
new
|
£0.717m
|
+£0.717m
|
Children’s and
Families Grant (consolidation)
|
£2.141m
|
£2.141m
|
£0.000m
|
Total
|
£2.141m
|
£2.858m
|
+£0.717m
|
Homelessness Funding
9.18
Homelessness and Rough Sleeping have become significant pressures
in the city linked to housing demand and other issues such as the
cost of private renting, substance misuse and mental health. The
Autumn Statement 2024 has provided significant additional
resources, but this will be more than offset by demand trends over
the current year. Homelessness funding includes a clear
preventative element and therefore future funding levels are
uncertain and are likely to be dependent on outcomes and the
effectiveness of national and local housing supply policies.
Homelessness
Funding
|
2024/25
|
2025/26
|
Change
|
Homelessness
Prevention Grant
|
£7.976m
|
£10.907m
|
+£2.931m
|
Rough Sleeping
Prevention and Recovery Grant
|
£2.364m
|
£2.364m
|
£0.000m
|
Rough Sleeping
Accommodation Programme
|
£0.813m
|
£0.856m
|
+£0.043m
|
Total
|
£11.153m
|
£14.127m
|
+£2.974m
|
New Homes Bonus (NHB)
9.19
The government has extended the NHB scheme for 2025/26 for the
6th year without reform and the council will receive a
one-off allocation of £1.014m based on the net increase in
new properties in the city between October 2023 and October 2024.
No announcements have been made about the longer term future of
this grant and therefore no assumptions have been made on any
additional one-off funding for future years. The one-off funding
for 2025/26 will be required to offset a forecast Collection Fund
deficit of over £3m for 2024/25.
Other Grants
9.20
There are many other grants received across a whole range of
services including Public Health grant, Domestic Abuse grants,
Housing Benefit Subsidy, Household Support Fund and a new Extended
Producer Responsibility (EPR) grant aimed at increasing recycling
rates. Many of these are ringfenced, carry specific conditions or
are one-off resources. The MTFS is primarily concerned with
unringfenced funding and does not therefore include information or
projections on these grants although many can help to relieve
pressures on General Fund budgets and services.
Corporate Inflation Provisions &
Assumptions
Pay
9.22
The current pay award assumption for 2025/26 is 2.75% on the basis
that inflation has reduced during 2024/25 as predicted by the OBR
and is expected to remain lower during 2025/26. Pay has been a
significant financial risk over the past 3 years during a period of
very high inflation. The pay award assumption is higher than
predicted CPI and therefore could mitigate this risk. Each 1%
increase equates to £1.600m for the General Fund budget. This
is also a significant risk area for the separate Schools and
Housing Revenue Account budgets.
Local Government Pensions
9.23
The last triennial review of the East Sussex Pension Scheme covered
the period 2023/24 to 2025/26 and confirmed the employer
contribution rate of 19.80% across the 3 years. The East Sussex
Pension Fund, in common with many funds across the country, is
currently performing well in terms of investment performance. If
this is sustained, this could be reflected in employer contribution
rates in the next triennial review, subject to other factors such
as pay awards. This may provide some flexibility in managing pay
awards.
Prices
9.24
The provision for general price inflation ranges between 1.00% and
3.00% as a base position depending on the type of expenditure. The
largest type of expenditure is Third Party Payments which covers
the majority of non-staffing expenditure within adults and
children’s social care which has an assumed base position
increase of 3.00% for 2025/26 and 2.5% thereafter. The impact of
inflation above these assumed base rates is separately identified
as a ‘Service Pressure’ rather than applying generic
increases to all service areas.
Inflation
Provision
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
Employee
costs
|
2.75%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
Premises
costs
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
Transport
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
Supplies and
Services
|
1.00%
|
1.00%
|
1.00%
|
1.00%
|
Third Party
Payments
|
3.00%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
Transfer
Payments
|
3.00%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
2.50%
|
Waste
PFI
|
3.50%
|
3.50%
|
3.50%
|
3.50%
|
Employers National Insurance
9.25
The increase in Employer’s National Insurance rate of 1.2%,
coupled with the reduction in the threshold on which employers
start paying NI to £5,000 (from £9,100) is estimated to
result in additional cost in 2025/26 of £4.0m to General Fund
council services, £0.7m to the Housing Revenue Account (HRA)
and at least £3.6m to Schools. This represents a 28% increase
for the General Fund/HRA and a 34% increase for Schools. The Local
Government Financial Settlement provides only £2.573m funding
for the General Fund, leaving a funding gap of £1.427m.
9.26
The settlement therefore falls far short of the protection promised
by the government, which the council raised in its response to the
formal consultation on the provisional settlement. It is also now
confirmed that HRAs will need to absorb the additional cost of NICs
while the position for Schools is not yet known in relation to the
Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) settlement.
9.27
Budget Commitments capture unavoidable contractual costs or other
known changes in expenditure, resources or income arising from
previous decisions made by the council including the capital
financing costs arising from previous and proposed Capital
Investment Programme approvals. Other commitments can arise from
legislative changes, function and funding changes, or changes above
the expected or budgeted costs such as national pay awards or
changes to employers’ pension or NIC contributions. Changes
to Section 31 grants are also captured under commitments, for
example, due to changes in the level of Business Rate reliefs which
government compensates local authorities for through S31 grants.
Known commitments over the next 4 years are shown below.
Commitments
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
Change in
capital programme financing costs
|
3.631
|
1.417
|
(0.029)
|
(0.079)
|
Funding release
of i360 loan security
|
1.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
Change in
Section 31 grants (NNDR reliefs) *
|
4.054
|
(0.530)
|
(0.544)
|
(0.644)
|
Cost of 2024/25
pay award above the budgeted assumption
|
1.300
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
Impacts of
previously approved decisions
|
4.456
|
0.892
|
0.350
|
0.250
|
Change in
contributions to/from reserves
|
(3.058)
|
3.015
|
(1.125)
|
0.000
|
Total
Commitments
|
11.383
|
4.797
|
(1.348)
|
(0.473)
|
*
Note, this relates to the reduction in Section 31 Grant from
government in relation to compensation for Business Rate reliefs
which will be reducing next year, therefore requiring lower
compensation. However, there will be a compensating increase in the
Business Rates collected and retained by the council due to removal
of the reliefs.
9.28
Impacts of previously approved decisions covers a wide range of
financial implications including reversals of decisions to use
one-off resources to support previous budgets, changes in insurance
premia, planned repayments of specific reserves and so on.
9.29
Medium term financial planning requires an assessment of the
investment requirements to support Council Plan priorities
including an assessment of the financial pressures (‘Service
Pressures’) facing priority services in terms of increases in
costs and demographic growth in demands. This applies particularly
to ‘demand-led’ statutory services for vulnerable
adults, families and children such as adult and children’s
social care and homelessness support.
9.30
Over the last decade or more, there has been significant growth in
demand for services with increasing prevalence of mental health
issues in children and adults, growing numbers of children with
Education Health & Care Plans, a growing homelessness problem
due to housing supply issues and the cost of renting, and increased
complexity of care across adult social care as people live longer
with complex and limiting health conditions.
9.31
When combined with the previous government’s long-term grant
reductions and restrictions on the allowable level of council tax
increases, these demand-led cost pressures have been the main
driver of the substantial ‘budget gaps’ that the
council has been experiencing for over a decade. Alongside
efficiencies and economies, this has required substantial service
savings and income generation programmes to achieve balanced
budgets. Current estimates are based on recent trends, forecast
demographic changes, and projections around market sufficiency and
pricing for externally commissioned services and contracts. High
level projections over the MTFS period are currently as shown
below:
Council Plan
Priority Investments
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
A
City to be Proud of:
|
|
|
|
|
City Operations
Services
|
3.958
|
3.213
|
3.800
|
3.000
|
New
Food Waste Collection & Collections Review
|
1.210
|
|
|
|
A
Healthy City where People Thrive:
|
|
|
|
|
Housing -
Emergency Accommodation
|
1.553
|
0.131
|
0.485
|
0.543
|
Housing -
Temporary Accommodation
|
0.054
|
0.078
|
0.454
|
0.622
|
Rough Sleeping
Prevention Services
|
0.146
|
|
|
|
A
Fair and Inclusive City:
|
|
|
|
|
Adult Social
Care Services
|
6.204
|
7.892
|
8.403
|
8.727
|
Children's
Social Care Services
|
1.559
|
3.444
|
3.373
|
3.249
|
Other Children
& Family Services
|
0.999
|
|
|
|
Home to School
Transportation
|
1.078
|
0.133
|
0.138
|
0.143
|
Educational
Services and Support
|
0.481
|
0.561
|
0.596
|
0.000
|
Increased SEN
investment
|
2.660
|
|
|
|
Loss of Housing
Benefit Subsidy grant
|
0.300
|
|
|
|
A
Responsive Council with Well-Run Services:
|
3.809
|
1.490
|
1.500
|
1.500
|
TOTAL COUNCIL
PLAN INVESTMENTS
|
24.011
|
16.942
|
18.749
|
17.784
|
9.32
Together with provision for inflation, including nationally
negotiated pay awards, the above investment requirements are not
expected to be fully matched by available resources which
include:
·
Council Tax increases, precepts or taxbase growth
·
Business Rate Retention increases or taxbase growth
·
Increases in Fees & Charges or new income generation
·
Increased Government Grant Funding
This means that there are anticipated
to be substantial budget shortfalls in future years, continuing the
trend over the last decade or more. This requires identification of
savings and transformation programmes that can help the council to
provide services more efficiently and at lower cost but may also
require some difficult choices regarding the services the council
is able to offer in future, particularly where these are not a
statutory requirement.
9.33
Bringing together all of the resource assumptions, inflation
assumptions and Council Plan Investments set out in this section
enables an overall projection of the council’s budget
position to be estimated for each of the next 4 years. This
includes commitments arising from previous decisions including the
financing of approved capital investment programmes.
Summary
Projections and Budget Gaps
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
Commitments
(incl. from previous decisions)
|
11.383
|
4.794
|
(1.348)
|
(0.473)
|
Net Inflation
(on Pay, Prices, Income, Pensions)
|
9.814
|
8.894
|
9.031
|
9.748
|
Government
Grant Funding
|
(11.551)
|
(3.903)
|
(4.098)
|
(4.303)
|
Other Funding
Changes & Assumptions
|
(1.514)
|
2.945
|
2.432
|
(0.250)
|
Sub-total
|
8.132
|
12.730
|
6.017
|
4.722
|
Net Investment
in Priority Services
|
24.011
|
16.942
|
18.749
|
17.784
|
Risk
provision 2025/26
|
1.747
|
(1.747)
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
Projected Net
Tax Base changes
|
(18.101)
|
(12.185)
|
(9.220)
|
(9.253)
|
Savings
Requirements (Budget Gaps)
|
15.789
|
15.740
|
15.546
|
13.253
|
9.34
The projected budget shortfalls above indicate the savings and
efficiencies required over the next 4 years in order to legally
balance the budget. The total projected savings requirement over
the next 4 years is £60.328m. However, there is still
significant uncertainty over these projections until the government
issues the expected multi-year settlements in Spring 2025. The MTFS
will be updated when setting out the planning assumptions for the
2026/27 budget setting process.
9.35
To address the projected budget savings requirement identified in
the MTFS projections above, the council will need to identify
savings from efficiencies and economies, or from reductions in
services, or alternative delivery of the services provided. To
ensure that statutory duties can be met and to be able to continue
to provide local services that residents and visitors rely on, the
council will look to challenge all costs, consider potential
sources of income, and review the affordability of services and
capital investments as set out in sections 3.12 to 3.22 above.
9.36
However, managing the scale of identified budget shortfalls over
the MTFS period requires step changes in the delivery of services,
a clear approach to managing demands through increased use of data
analysis, technology and emerging AI, and changes in the way
partnerships and collaboration work across the city and the council
to improve prevention and support. This requires significant
transformation and change programmes that will require one-off
investment as necessary changes would not otherwise be delivered
within the timeframes required to achieve the council’s
priorities or achieve financial sustainability.
9.38
The transformation and savings programmes currently identified over
the next 4-years are summarised below but further business cases
for invest-to-save initiatives are being developed and can come
forward at any time. The proposals for 2025/26 are provided in more
detail in the annual budget report to Cabinet and Budget Council as
these must be specifically approved as part of the annual budget
proposals and the setting of the Council Tax. For future years,
programmes and estimated savings are only for noting and will
change and evolve as the council’s financial position changes
with updated estimates, funding announcements from government
including expected multi-year settlements, and, later, the impact
of devolution and local government reorganisation.
Transformation
& Savings Programmes
|
2025/26
£m
|
2026/27
£m
|
2027/28
£m
|
2028/29
£m
|
Changing
delivery models for services:
|
|
|
|
|
Learning
Disability Service Delivery model
|
0.400
|
0.300
|
0.200
|
0.100
|
Adult Social
Care Service Delivery model
|
|
0.400
|
0.400
|
0.400
|
Ireland Lodge
Short Term Care Remodelling
|
0.200
|
|
|
|
New In-house
SEN Provision (Rainbow Lodge)
|
0.200
|
0.200
|
0.200
|
0.100
|
Discharge
Priority (Craven Vale)
|
0.200
|
0.200
|
|
|
City Parks
delivery model
|
|
0.378
|
0.578
|
|
New Temporary
Accommodation Leasing Model
|
0.195
|
0.195
|
|
|
New Housing
Allocations Policy Implementation
|
0.950
|
0.950
|
|
|
Housing Company
Temporary Accommodation Model
|
|
0.775
|
0.250
|
0.250
|
Remodelling
Welfare Support
|
0.290
|
|
|
|
Lifeguard
Service Alternative Provision
|
0.110
|
|
|
|
Procurement and
Commissioning economies:
|
|
|
|
|
Adult Social
Care Provider Management
|
5.076
|
0.900
|
0.600
|
0.300
|
Review of
commissioned Housing Services
|
0.350
|
|
|
|
Contract
Management Invest-to-Save Programme
|
|
0.240
|
0.400
|
0.400
|
Category
spending review e.g. transport, training, supplies & services,
etc.
|
|
0.150
|
0.100
|
0.100
|
Demand
management and Prevention Programmes:
|
|
|
|
|
Transforming
Adult Social Care (ICS)
|
|
4.000
|
4.100
|
4.100
|
Children's
Social Care Reform
|
|
0.300
|
1.900
|
1.750
|
Housing and
Temp. Accomm. Relocation Initiatives
|
0.705
|
0.660
|
|
|
Foster Care
Recruitment programme
|
0.874
|
0.600
|
0.580
|
0.552
|
Income &
Commercialisation Initiatives
|
1.063
|
2.516
|
0.811
|
0.675
|
Efficiency,
Automation & Digital Programmes:
|
|
|
|
|
Digital, Data
& Technology Investment Strategy
|
0.030
|
0.235
|
0.350
|
0.350
|
Corporate
Systems Improvement Programme
|
|
0.192
|
0.380
|
|
Adult Social
Care Assessment Service Redesign
|
0.140
|
|
|
|
Housing Benefit
Admin Caseload transfer to DWP
|
0.300
|
0.170
|
0.200
|
0.200
|
Service
Redesigns and Functional Alignments
|
1.791
|
0.470
|
0.510
|
0.500
|
Cessation or
reduction of non-statutory services:
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction or
reprovision of non-statutory services
|
1.173
|
0.506
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
Supported
Employment Service Funding Review
|
0.275
|
|
|
|
Library Service
Review
|
0.111
|
0.118
|
|
|
Alternative
Funding of Services:
|
|
|
|
|
CIL Strategic
Investment for Thriving Communities
|
0.184
|
|
|
|
Reprioritising
Public Health Investment
|
1.002
|
|
|
|
Other new
funding sources or repurposing
|
0.090
|
0.150
|
0.250
|
0.250
|
Corporate/Cross-Cutting
Programmes:
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Landlord and Net Zero Programme
|
|
0.100
|
0.265
|
0.214
|
Workspace
Innovation Programme
|
|
0.535
|
0.472
|
0.162
|
Absence
Management and Agency Staffing Changes
|
|
0.400
|
0.400
|
0.250
|
Review of
council device estate
|
0.080
|
0.100
|
0.100
|
0.100
|
Further
Transformation Business Cases required
|
|
|
2.000
|
2.000
|
Totals
|
15.789
|
15.740
|
15.546
|
13.253
|
9.39
The above table includes high level estimates of savings from
potential transformation, efficiency or income generation
programmes together with planned reductions in non-statutory or
discretionary services. Some estimates are based on more detailed
business cases, for example, the Workspace Innovation programme,
while others require more information but are based on prudential
assumptions using best practice case studies and research, industry
standard assumptions, or reasonable estimates and projections. A
brief commentary on each area is provided below.
Changing delivery models for services
9.40
This area covers a wide range of initiatives aimed at either
providing services differently or changing the model of service to
either manage demands more effectively or reduce overall costs.
This can involve insourcing or outsourcing decisions, changes in
the type of support or provision, and changes driven by advances in
technology or practice.
Procurement and Commissioning Economies
9.41
The council procures and commissions goods and services of over
£300 million annually as it does not provide all services
in-house. For example, the large majority of adult and
children’s social care is commissioned from the private and
independent sectors. Ensuring competitive tender processes,
effective contract management and appropriate service
specifications and performance monitoring are therefore key to
achieving good value for money. The council plans to focus on Adult
Social Care provider costs which have increased markedly in recent
years and where the cost of provision in the city benchmarks
unfavourably with comparators.
9.42
There will also be investment in Contract Management resources to
ensure the council is receiving the services and performance it is
paying for from higher value contracts as well as category spending
reviews to explore whether improved procurement and/or spending
controls could bring down spend across a number of expenditure
headings such as supplies and services or travel costs.
Demand management and Prevention
Programmes
9.43
Key areas of focus will include Adult Social Care, Homelessness and
Children in Care where transformation will require work with key
strategic partners in the city. These programmes focus on changing
care pathways, working holistically with city partners to provide
multi-disciplinary support and solutions, and working hard to
ensure that prevention and early help and support can contribute to
managing demands and reducing medium term costs. An example is
investing in Foster Care recruitment which not only results in more
stable care settings and better outcomes for children and young
people but can significantly reduce costs over the longer
term.
9.44
Adult and Children’s Social Care programmes are also
supported by significant national research programmes, funding and
clear policy direction including the forthcoming Children’s
Social Care reform. The latter is aimed at changing the cycle of
crisis through more holistic multi-agency support and preventative
work and providing powers to tackle the inordinately high cost of
some private and independent sector care provision, particularly
where care quality and outcomes for children, young people and care
leavers are below expectations.
Income Generation & Commercialisation
Initiatives
9.45
A wide range of income generation ideas are being put forward to
either generate more income from existing fees & charges
through appropriate uplifts, or extending service offers, alongside
other commercially focused activities. Examples in 2025/26 include
expanding the Trade Waste and popular Garden Waste collections
services to generate income, promoting greater use of 3G pitches by
sports clubs, generating donations to help improve our parks and
green spaces, marketing ‘The Wing’ at the Brighton
Centre to increase business and delegate use, and increasing income
from the Carelink Out of Hours service. Note however that Parking
Charges are being frozen partly because traffic in the city has
reduced since the pandemic (a key objective of Sustainable
Transport policies), partly to balance the impact on the visitor
and business economies, and partly because other alternatives for
disincentivising car use in the urban area (including Park &
Ride) are being developed.
Efficiency, Automation & Digital
Programmes:
9.46
These programmes cover savings expected to accrue from major
investments in digital, data and systems improvements provided
through either the Capital Investment Programme, Transformation
Fund and/or IT&D Future Fund. The council has invested
significantly in a Digital, Data & Technology (DDaT) strategy
which can be seen in the Capital Investment Programme alongside
significant investment in Phase 1 of a Corporate Systems
Improvement (CSI) programme to re-procure and enhance corporate HR,
Finance, Payroll and Procurement systems. Other smaller investments
including upgraded applications and digital developments and
increasing use of AI to collate and generate data and information,
will help to support service redesign and automation over the MTFS
period.
Cessation or reduction of non-statutory
services
9.47
While every effort will be made to protect and improve essential
local services, particularly those that support Council Plan
priorities, the financial situation inevitably means that the
continued provision, subsidy or funding of some non-statutory or
discretionary services needs to be kept under review in the context
of overall priorities. This may also mean exploring the concept of
providing ‘statutory minimum’ services in some areas to
assist the council’s financial sustainability and enable a
balanced budget and MTFS. Detailed savings proposals are included
in the budget report for 2025/26 and for later years, an assumed
saving is included based on a minimum contribution.
Alternative Funding of Services
9.48
In 2025/26 there are two key proposals; the first is regarding the
repurposing of Public Health funding to rigorously challenge the
current use of the £22.6m ringfenced grant and ensure that it
is applied to priority areas of preventative support that have the
greatest impact. More details are provided in the budget report
which sets out the areas identified for dis-investment and the
areas for re-investment. The key principle being applied is to
focus Public Health funds on core mandated services such as Sexual
Health and Healthy Child Programmes but to refocus other available
funds to support core preventative services, for example Family
Hubs, to both improve outcomes for children and families but also,
critically, to prevent higher longer term care and support costs.
This necessarily involves very difficult decisions regarding where
dis-investment will be targeted.
9.49
The second proposal is similarly to identify key areas of increased
cost or demand where the Household Support Fund can be applied to
support prevention and help to avoid greater costs in the longer
term, particularly in respect of homelessness and emergency
accommodation. This is not shown as a saving because it is direct
additional funding from the Household Support Fund 2025/26.
9.50
For future years, a prudential assumption of further savings
opportunities is included in the MTFS supported by planned
recruitments to Funding Officer and Donation Schemes Officer roles
on an invest-to-save basis.
Cross-Cutting Programmes
9.51
Cross-cutting programmes can impact council-wide and can involve
change management and staff development programmes. Opportunities
have been identified in respect of continued energy efficiencies
and carbon reduction measures across the Corporate Landlord estate,
linked to the Net Zero Programme and the council’s Workspace
Innovation Programme aimed at providing modern, collaborative
workspaces but also reducing overall administrative buildings
occupancy. Savings in relation to Absence Management and Agency
Staffing will require significant service redesign, improved
reporting and oversight, and potential policy changes to ensure the
council compares well with comparator authorities and other
industries where it is currently falling short. Many other
cross-cutting opportunities are possible and will continue to be
explored over the MTFS period.
9.52
The Transformation Fund will be kept under review as budget plans
develop and spend-to-save opportunities and investment requirements
emerge in more detail over the planning period. At this stage, the
indicative requirement for the Transformation Fund for 2025/26 to
2028/29 is shown in the table below. However, this is considered to
be a minimum investment level based on the experience of previous
4-year invest-to-save programmes.
4-Year
Indicative Transformation Fund (using Capital Receipts
Flexibilities)
|
Category of
Investment
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
Invest-to-Save
business cases for transformation
|
2.600
|
2.600
|
1.500
|
1.500
|
Digital and AI
Development Resources
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
Managing Staffing Changes
(exit packages)
|
1.250
|
1.250
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
Enabling
Resources (PMO, Workspace, HR, etc)
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
Resources to
generate Capital Receipts
|
0.150
|
0.150
|
0
|
0
|
Total
Transformation Fund
|
6.000
|
6.000
|
4.000
|
4.000
|
9.53
The investments are described in summary below:
Invest-to-Save Business Cases
·
The medium term planning process
encourages innovation and invest-to-save business cases aimed at
supporting the achievement of Council Plan priorities and,
importantly, contributing to the future financial sustainability of
the council. Business cases need to demonstrate a return on
investment within a reasonable time period (max 5 years) but
ideally within the 4-year medium term financial plan period. A
minimum investment of £8.2 million is anticipated but the
profile of this over the 4-year period is likely to be uneven and
is most likely to need to be front-loaded.
Digital and AI Development & Skills:
·
Digital and AI is a specific form of
invest-to-save. The council has already invested heavily in staff,
systems and technologies to provide improved digital and on-line
services. However, this process does not stop and as technologies,
including AI and robotics, improve and develop, the council will
need to move with the technology and ensure appropriate skills are
developed to make the most of any investment. Provision of at least
£1 million each year is included but some of this cost could
potentially be transferred to revenue in later years if this is
affordable within the overall budget envelope.
Managing Staffing Changes:
·
Transformation and change inevitably
results in significant changes to services which will entail
changes to the mix or level of staffing in services. This can lead
to potential redundancies which the council attempts to manage
through holding vacancies or redeployments as far as possible, but
otherwise through voluntary severance where this meets the
council’s business case criteria. This can involve
significant redundancy and/or pension strain costs. At least
£3.5 million is expected to be required over the 4-year
period supporting severance of an average of 25 to 30 staff each
year. Alongside vacancy management and redeployment this could
enable reductions of between 50 to 100 full time equivalent posts
each year from the council’s staffing establishment,
currently around 3,559 full time equivalent posts. This relies on
the necessary efficiencies through service redesign or
technological improvements being deliverable.
Resources to generate Capital Receipts:
·
Generating sufficient capital
receipts in good time to support both the Transformation Fund and
the 5-year Capital Investment Programme will require additional
conveyancing and surveyor resources. Disposals are often complex
and time-consuming, involving many parties, tenancies or other
complications such as lease re-gearing or land and property
transfer negotiations. Without additional resources, disposals will
not succeed at pace and are unlikely to provide the necessary
financial resources. In particular, there is a present urgency to
generate receipts due to a number of disposals being delayed and
decisions on a new pipeline of disposals being required by Cabinet.
An estimated investment of £0.150 million for the first two
years is included above.
Transformation Enabling Resources
9.54
Ensuring that transformation and change can be delivered requires
resources that can be flexibly deployed across different programmes
or to ongoing long-term change programmes.
Transformation
Enabling Costs (4-Years)
|
Category of
Investment
|
Annual
Cost
|
£m
|
Project &
Programme Management Resources
|
0.640
|
Workspace
Innovation Resources (to rationalise operational buildings)
*
|
0.180
|
HR Management
of Change and Policy Support
|
0.128
|
Contribution to
Leadership Development Support
|
0.052
|
Total
|
1.000
|
*
This resource will also be supported by additional, eligible
capital funding through the Asset Management Fund as this team
works on capital asset disposals and modernisation and
refurbishment of office spaces, expected to be circa £0.140m
per annum.
9.56
The council is required to maintain an adequate level of reserves
to deal with future forecast or unexpected pressures. Councils are
not permitted to allow spend to exceed available resources which
would result in an overall deficit and potential Section 114 report
to the full Council. Sections 32 and 43 of the Local Government
Finance Act 1992 require authorities to have regard to the level of
reserves to meet estimated future spend when calculating the budget
requirement.
9.57
Reserves can be held for three main purposes:
·
A Working Balance to help cushion the impact of uneven cash flows,
unexpected events and avoid unnecessary temporary borrowing;
·
Additional risk provisions to mitigate against specific, identified
risks; and
·
A means of building up funds (i.e. earmarked reserves) to meet
known or predicted liabilities.
9.58
A summary of earmarked reserves and the forecast of reserves and
balances can be found in Annex
A.
9.59
The appropriate level of reserves is a judgement based on a number
of factors including the level of risk inherent in the budget
planning cycle, the availability of resources and other recourses
to support such as the government’s offer to local
authorities to engage with MHCLG if Emergency Financial Support is
needed. Holding very high levels of reserves and balances in light
of current financial challenges would not be appropriate given the
need to support and maintain service delivery as far as possible.
Similarly, very low levels of reserves or balances may leave the
authority exposed to cash flow difficulties.
9.60
An assessment of the risk environment is required in order to
determine the suitability of the baseline reserves and balances
position. This assessment should include consideration of the
robustness of efficiency plans, levels of uncertainty regarding
cost estimates (demand / price inflation), consideration of
national and local policy changes and wider national economic and
political factors.
9.61
The MTFS includes the following principles for the management of
reserves:
·
Reserves should not normally be used as a substitute for permanent
efficiencies to meet permanent spending pressures;
·
Reserve levels and contributions should be reviewed at least twice
annually at budget and outturn to ensure contributions are equal to
planned use over the medium-term;
·
Over the medium-term, the Working Balance should be maintained at
the minimum recommended level of £9 million. Where it falls
below this, the MTFS should be updated to show how the Working
Balance will be restored;
·
Earmarked Reserves must be approved and should only be held if
absolutely necessary and where there is a clear future and/or
multi-year commitment or liability;
·
Additional risk provisions should ideally be built up where
specific or enhanced risks are identified. This can be provided
through either:
·
Setting aside resources from a planned or fortuitous outturn
underspend;
·
Building in provision for an additional risk provision in the
Annual Budget; or
·
Building in provision over a longer period through the MTFS.
9.62
As noted below, the authority has a comparatively low level of
overall reserves (i.e. the Working Balance plus earmarked reserves)
but has managed successfully with the exception of 2022/23 which
saw an overspend of £3.3 million which reduced the Working
Balance to around £5.6 million. The MTFS aims to ensure the
Working Balance is restored and that sufficient risk provisions are
provided to support the significant savings programmes required to
balance the budget and MTFS over the 4-year period.
9.63
The council’s external auditor has
commented on the financial sustainability of the
authority and has highlighted this as a significant weakness over
the past two years. A strategy to restore the Working Balance and
provide sufficient risk provisions will therefore help to address
the auditor’s improvement recommendations.
One-off Resource Requirements
9.64
Additional one-off resources may be needed in 2025/26 or later
years for a wide range of reasons which could present additional
financial challenges as these would require identification of
resources to meet any commitments. One-off resources may need to be
identified to cover the following:
·
Any Collection Fund deficits (current monitoring indicates a
£3.139m net deficit for 2024/25) *;
·
Any General Fund outturn overspend (i.e. TBM overspend) *;
·
Any increase to provisions or reserves required to cover increased
cost estimates *;
·
Any unavoidable/unexpected one-off expenditure or commitments;
·
Any one-off allocations for priorities (subject to availability of
resources).
* The reverse is also true whereby
surpluses or underspends could increase the availability of one-off
resources or, at least, reduce the call on one-off resources.
9.65
Projected one-off resource requirements for 2025/26 will be
reported within the main budget report to Cabinet and Budget
Council, reflecting latest estimates and projections from in-year
TBM budget monitoring and monitoring of Collection Funds together
with any additional identified one-off funding requirements or
additional available one-off resources.
9.66
The Cipfa Resilience Index compares a council's position across a
range of measures associated with financial risk, highlighting
where additional scrutiny may be required. The data for the latest
resilience index is obtained from the Revenue Expenditure and
Financing England Outturn Report 2023-24 ('RO Forms') and reflects
figures submitted by Local Authorities to MHCLG, published on 12
December 2024.
9.67
The findings of the Resilience Index 2024 indicate that reserves
have fallen nationally and that social care expenditure is still
increasing well beyond inflation. This is in line with other
evidence from the sector and while it may not be unexpected it is
crucial to understand that these two indicators play an important
part in the sustainability and health of the local government
sector.
9.68
The snapshot below (please enlarge for improved legibility)
compares BHCC with ‘nearest neighbour’ comparator
authorities (mainly similar sized unitary authorities). It shows
that reserves are relatively low (13.8% of net budget) and compare
unfavourably with comparators although it is clear that more
authorities, including counties, are now exhausting reserves at a
very fast rate. Social care spend as a proportion of the net budget
appears to be average while borrowing (Gross External Debt) is also
close to the average, recognising that more than 50% of
BHCC’s debt is related to the HRA (Council Housing
Stock).

9.69
CIPFA has developed a Financial Management Code (FM Code), designed
to ‘support good practice in financial management and to
assist local authorities in demonstrating and maintaining their
financial sustainability.
9.70
It is for individual authorities to determine whether they meet the
standards and to make any changes that may be required to ensure
compliance. Officers have carried out a review of practices and
reported on the findings against the standards set out in the code
to the former Audit & Standards Committee in June 2023.
9.71
The overview of the Authority’s level of assessed compliance
indicated that there were no Red (Minimal) compliance areas, 7
Amber (Partial) areas of compliance and 10 Green (Substantial)
areas of compliance.
9.72
Overall, the council’s self-assessment therefore indicated a
reasonable-to-good level of compliance with the underlying
principles of the FM Code but even for areas where there is full or
substantial compliance, the aim is to strive for continuous
improvement and therefore some improvement actions were identified
and continue to be implemented.
10.2
The Capital Strategy must be approved by the full Council and aims
to ensure that all members can understand and determine the overall
long-term policy objectives for the use and deployment of capital
resources including borrowing. The Capital Strategy therefore
provides detailed information on capital resource projections,
capital financing need, and the approach to non-treasury
investments (e.g. commercial property) and the management of
risk.
10.3
An officer-led, Capital Programme Board (CPB), ensures that the
framework for setting the Capital Investment Programme continues to
focus on Council Plan priorities, deliverability and affordability,
and adheres to the Capital Strategy approved by full Council. The
CPB also monitors financial performance and service outcomes.
10.4
Officers work closely with Cabinet to shape the development of the
Capital Programme on an ongoing basis. Cabinet approve the addition
of new schemes through Targeted Budget Management reports or
through separate scheme reports, or through the annual budget
approval process. Governance structures, processes and procedures
of the Capital Programme are continually assessed to strengthen
financial management, decision making, and accountability.
·
Seek to protect as far as possible capital grant funding for
education, housing, transport network and public realm
investment.
·
Pool all remaining non ring-fenced capital resources and allocate
these to priority areas for investment.
·
Allocate capital resources to key strategic investment funds as
follows:
o £0.250m
per annum for ‘major projects’ investment through a
Strategic Investment Fund (SIF).
These projects support the economy through regeneration of key
sites which can often also lever in housing development.
o £1.000m
per annum towards the Information
Technology & Digital Future Fund from 2027/28 onward to
provide continued investment in the Digital Data and Technology
Strategy alongside Transformation Fund resources.
o £0.750m
per annum towards the Commercial Assets
Investment Fund (CAIF) to support essential property
repairs, maintenance and improvements to existing commercial and
agricultural properties to protect and potentially enhance
commercial revenue income.
o £1.000m
per annum to the Asset Management Fund
(AMF) to
support essential property improvements, minimise backlog
maintenance, improve sustainability and energy efficiency of
buildings where possible, and reduce longer term maintenance
costs;
o A minimum of
£2.000m per annum through borrowing to support investment in
planned maintenance in operational and
social care buildings.
·
Assess the potential social value of surplus or underperforming
assets against the potential disposal value and where possible
maximise the use of assets to enhance social value across a 4-year
asset management plan.
·
Subject to an assessment of the potential social value, generate
capital receipts from the disposal of surplus or under-performing
assets and to deploy the proceeds from the sale of capital assets
as follows:
o for
investment in transformation and change programmes to improve
services and contribute to financial sustainability by using the
government’s ‘capital receipt flexibilities’ that
allows revenue costs to be capitalised and funded from capital
receipts where this generates efficiencies (savings) and
improvements, or;
o for
reinvestment in capital investment programme schemes, or;
o for
repayment of debt or for investment, for example, to offset any
loss of rental income in the revenue budget.
·
Use the net receipts from ‘right to buy’ sales from
council housing to reinvest directly into additional housing
supply.
·
Use unsupported borrowing for:
o
service improvements where a business case has been developed and
approved, and can demonstrate that the investment will provide
value for money or return on investment and that the additional
financing costs are reflected in the revenue budget;
o
purchase of vehicles and plant where an options appraisal
demonstrates that borrowing provides the best value for money and
the financing costs are reflected in the revenue budget;
o
investment to support Council Plan priorities where the financial
impact of any decision is treated as a commitment in future
years’ budgets and is affordable;
o
restructuring the funding of the approved capital programme when
this provides a more efficient use of capital and revenue
resources;
·
Explore all funding options including partnerships and one-off
bidding processes. The council can bid for capital investment
through funding streams such as the National Heritage Lottery Fund,
Arts Council, Homes England grants, and the Local Authority Housing
Fund (LAHF). The council can also use its land or property to
facilitate private sector or partnership based investments or
funding bids including brownfield land release schemes.
·
Explore capital investment opportunities to support the
city’s net zero carbon objectives and incorporate in future
capital investment plans.
10.6
In summary, the majority of the council’s capital investment
is within longer-term programmes that support Council Plan
priorities. The key programmes and projects, aligned to Council
Plan priorities, are as follows:
Homes for Everyone:
·
Housing supply schemes including New Homes for Neighbourhoods and
Home Purchase Scheme;
·
Investment in new build housing through the Housing Revenue Account
and Housing Joint Venture (with Hyde Housing);
·
Investment in maintaining and improving the Council Housing Stock
and building safety through the Housing Revenue Account;
·
The Strategic Investment Fund (SIF) to provide legal and project
management resources to support major regeneration programmes that
draw in substantial private sector investment.
A Healthy City where People Thrive:
·
Investment in a new leisure centre at the King Alfred site;
·
Investment in the Hove Beach Park supported by Levelling-Up
funding;
·
The Education Capital programme, which provides investment from
central government including New Pupil Places, Education Capital
Maintenance and Devolved Formula Capital for schools;
·
Disabled Facilities Grant funded adaptations to support
independence at home.
A City to be Proud of:
·
Renovation and restoration of the Madeira Terraces;
·
Development of the Black Rock site and Valley Gardens Phase
III;
·
Investment in the Royal Pavilion Estate supported by the Heritage
Lottery;
·
The Local Transport Plan (LTP) covering a wide range of
transport-related schemes;
·
Significant investment in coast protection programmes;
·
The Carbon Net Zero investment programme.
A Responsive Council with Well-run
Services:
·
The Information Technology & Digital Future Fund to maintain
and upgrade the council’s infrastructure and IT
architecture;
·
The Asset Management Fund (AMF) to maintain operational buildings,
improve sustainability and reduce long term maintenance costs;
·
Corporate Planned Maintenance (PMB) to undertake planned building
works and upgrades;
·
Vehicle and plant annual replacement programmes.
Summary of
Programmes and Funding
|
Profiled
Budget 2025/26
|
Profiled
Budget 2026/27
|
Profiled
Budget 2027/28
|
Profiled
Budget 2028/29
|
Profiled
Budget 2029/30
|
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
£m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approved
Schemes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Families,
Children & Wellbeing
|
10.262
|
1.419
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
City
Operations
|
55.328
|
14.345
|
6.810
|
5.123
|
2.540
|
Homes &
Adult Social Care – HRA
|
45.275
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Homes &
Adult Social Care
|
6.898
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
Corporate
Support Functions
|
14.968
|
0.532
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
Schemes Not Yet approved
|
|
|
|
|
|
Families,
Children & Wellbeing
|
4.700
|
4.650
|
4.600
|
4.600
|
4.600
|
City
Operations
|
33.442
|
23.610
|
9.924
|
12.487
|
6.550
|
Homes &
Adult Social Care - HRA
|
65.823
|
169.075
|
88.287
|
56.749
|
54.731
|
Homes &
Adult Social Care
|
1.500
|
1.500
|
1.500
|
1.500
|
1.500
|
Corporate
Support Functions
|
8.750
|
8.750
|
6.750
|
6.750
|
3.750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
246.946
|
224.381
|
118.371
|
87.709
|
74.171
|
Funded
by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
Grants (un-ringfenced)
|
18.446
|
13.731
|
8.900
|
8.900
|
8.900
|
Government
Grants (ringfenced)
|
52.815
|
9.074
|
2.530
|
2.282
|
2.180
|
Capital
Receipts
|
25.768
|
15.170
|
8.550
|
7.404
|
2.500
|
Capital
Reserves
|
0.222
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Specific
Reserves
|
1.560
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
External
Contributions
|
1.358
|
3.270
|
2.050
|
0.467
|
-
|
Direct Revenue
Funding - General Fund
|
0.625
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
0.500
|
HRA
Revenue Contribution to Capital
|
16.449
|
16.778
|
17.114
|
17.456
|
17.805
|
Borrowing
|
129.703
|
164.858
|
77.727
|
49.700
|
41.286
|
Total
Funding
|
246.946
|
224.381
|
118.371
|
87.709
|
74.171
|
10.8
Capital receipts from the sale of surplus land and buildings are an
important capital resource that not only provides funding for the
capital investment programme but also supports critical
invest-to-save transformation programmes using the
government’s capital receipt flexibilities.
10.9
Capital receipt projections are regularly reviewed having
considered the social value implications of any decision to dispose
first. The council’s former strategy was to re-balance the
property portfolio by disposing of low or non-performing commercial
properties and reinvesting in more viable commercial property
investments. However, this is now considerably more challenging as
borrowing from the Public Works Loan Board is now prohibited for
commercial property investment and so the current focus is on
investment in existing assets through the Commercial Asset
Investment Fund (CAIF) supported by capital receipts.
10.10 Capital receipts
are under severe pressure due to competing demands for the
resources and the certainty and speed with which capital receipts
can be realised. This puts in jeopardy the council’s ability
to support the following objectives:
·
Funding of annual investment funds such as the Strategic Investment
Fund (SIF) and Asset Management Fund (AMF) referred to above;
·
Investment to maintain the commercial property portfolio
(CAIF);
·
Support for accelerating housing supply schemes; and
·
Funding of the Transformation Fund to support implementation of
invest-to-save efficiency programmes, including digital and AI
investment, over the Medium Term Financial Strategy period. A
minimum investment of £20 million has been identified over
the next 4 years.
10.11 Taking into
account capital programme approvals already made and projected
commitments for funding the above continuing objectives, the
current expected requirement for capital receipts (which constantly
changes) over the MTFS period is as shown below.
Capital Receipt
Requirements
|
2024/25
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
Capital
Programme Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Programme approvals
|
(5,842)
|
(8,179)
|
(300)
|
(50)
|
|
Commercial
Property Investment Strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
Costs
|
(25)
|
(25)
|
(25)
|
(25)
|
0
|
Loss of Rent
(capitalised)
|
(639)
|
(1,082)
|
(197)
|
0
|
0
|
Commercial
Asset Investment Fund (CAIF)
|
(750)
|
(750)
|
(750)
|
(750)
|
(750)
|
Capitalisation
for Modernisation / Transformation Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outgoing
Modernisation Fund:
Managing Staff
Changes 2024/25
|
(1,900)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Current
Modernisation Fund commitments
|
(3,410)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
New
Transformation
Fund:
Estimated
programme expenditure
|
|
(6,000)
|
(6,000)
|
(4,000)
|
(4,000)
|
Corporate
Investment Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT&D
Fund
|
|
(500)
|
(500)
|
(500)
|
(500)
|
Asset
Management Fund
|
|
(1,000)
|
(1,000)
|
(1,000)
|
(1,000)
|
Strategic
Investment Fund (Regeneration)
|
|
(250)
|
(250)
|
(250)
|
(250)
|
Total
Commitments
|
(12,566)
|
(17,786)
|
(9,022)
|
(6,575)
|
(6,500)
|
10.12 Comparison of
existing commitments and projected demands on capital receipts with
known or planned disposals has been undertaken as shown in the
table below, indicating a significant shortfall of circa £24
million that will require substantial further disposals to be
identified.
Capital Receipt
Projections
|
2024/25
|
2025/26
|
2026/27
|
2027/28
|
2028/29
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
Brought forward
balance
|
77
|
(647)
|
(5,249)
|
(11,467)
|
(18,042)
|
|
Expected
Capital Receipts
|
11,842
|
13,184
|
2,804
|
0
|
0
|
|
Capital Receipt
commitments
|
(12,566)
|
(17,786)
|
(9,022)
|
(6,575)
|
(6,500)
|
|
Carry forward
balance (deficit)
|
(647)
|
(5,249)
|
(11,467)
|
(18,042)
|
(24,542)
|
|
10.13 Identifying a
pipeline of disposals to generate capital receipts is therefore
important to support the council’s ambitions and
sustainability. A recent review of the council’s assets
identified a programme of disposals having assessed risk/difficulty
and timeframes for realisations. Over the short term, considered to
be 1-3 years, 12 properties have been identified for disposal with
a varying degree of risk and complexity totalling approx.
£8m. Over the medium term, 3-5 years, 9 further properties
have been identified mainly comprising of heritage assets. Over the
longer term, 5-10 years, 15 assets have been identified with a high
degree of complexity / risk and are mainly urban fringe sites. A
new Disposals Strategy is currently in development to identify
further potential asset disposals to support competing demands.
This is expected to come forward to Cabinet for March 2025.
10.14 In summary, key
opportunities to generate capital receipts are likely to come
from:
·
Reducing Administrative/Civic buildings and disposing of part or
whole buildings;
·
Lease re-gearing opportunities – but likely to need to
compromise housing ambitions;
·
Further Commercial Asset disposals – however, this forgoes
revenue income which is highly problematic and adds to future
budget gaps. There may also be debt to pay off (capitalise)
reducing the available receipt.
·
School sites – this is a major potential area for generating
receipts following closure of two school sites owned by the
council;
·
Further rationalisation of service-led operational buildings and
access points.
11.1
The MTFS is primarily concerned with the development of the General
Fund revenue and capital budget. However, there are links to the
Housing Revenue Account (Council Housing) revenue budget and
capital programme which follow a separate budget setting
process.
11.2
The Housing Revenue Account (HRA) is a ring-fenced account which
covers the management and maintenance of council owned housing
stock. This must be in balance, meaning that the authority must
show in its financial planning that HRA income meets expenditure
and that the HRA is consequently viable.
11.3
The introduction of self-financing in 2012 provided additional
resources from the retention of all rental income and, through
greater control locally, enabled longer term planning to improve
the management and maintenance of council homes. Since that
introduction there have been a number of factors which have
compromised the financial stability of the HRA leading to a
projected deficit position from 2026/27.
11.4
Understanding the demands on resources over the coming years
remains key to ensuring the financial viability for the HRA. There
are several challenges which are impacting on the financial
viability over the medium to long term. This includes the rising
cost of services and investment needs arising in relation to
compliance with the Building Safety Act, Fire Safety Regulations
and Social Housing Regulation Bill as well as the impact of
inflation on services. In addition to these the rise in National
Insurance costs will have a direct impact for the HRA although it
is expected that this will be in part funded via a separate funding
arrangement. Further information will be provided by government
regarding the funding arrangements in due course.
11.5
An emerging issue for the council is investment requirement in 8
Large Panel System (LPS) blocks across the city. Whilst investment
was anticipated over a longer period of time for these blocks,
there is a need to ensure the blocks remain safe in the short term
with measures being introduced which require a significant revenue
investment for the HRA over the short term. Longer term plans are
under consideration for these blocks with required capital
investment forming part of future budget papers where reasonable
estimates can be made.
11.6
The Autumn Statement 2024 announced that the rent settlement allows
landlords to raise rents by CPI plus 1%. This currently extends to
April 2026, with a view to be able to increase rents by CPI +1% for
the 4 years succeeding 2025/26. This has been factored into the
HRA’s MTFS. However, it is clear that this will fall short of
being able to address the HRA’s financing cost pressures and
support the large increases that the HRA has faced over the last
few years.
11.7
Further to this 5-year settlement it is reported that Central
Government is considering a 10-year rent settlement. Whilst this
would be a welcome boost for the long-term financial forecast, it
will not address the current financial issues that the HRA is
facing. A strategy needs to be developed to be able to manage those
issues in the short term.
11.8
The capital plan for the HRA is split into two main areas of
investment for improving the quality, safety, and energy efficiency
of council homes and for the supply of new housing. Investment in
existing stock is funded from direct revenue funding from
tenants’ rents (including associated rent rebates) and HRA
borrowing that is supported by tenants’ rents over a longer
period. Investment in new supply is mainly funded from retained
capital receipts (including Right to Buy sales and commuted sums),
grant funding and HRA borrowing.
11.9
The Programme reflects the delivery of planned maintenance,
improvement programmes and major capital projects informed by a
recent stock condition survey and ongoing surveys of the
council’s housing stock. This is alongside the existing and
emerging priorities of the HRA Asset Management Strategy. Key
considerations include improving the safety and quality of homes
and ensuring regulatory compliance is met. This includes working in
consultation with external bodies such as the Regulator of Social
Housing and East Sussex Fire and Rescue Authority, as well as
tenants and leaseholders to inform the planned and major works
strategy. Investment also continues in carbon reduction initiatives
to support the city’s commitment of becoming carbon neutral
by 2030.
11.10 The HRA
continues to look at the range of initiatives it has to deliver
additional housing and meet the commitment to deliver new
affordable council homes. These initiatives include the New Homes
for Neighbourhoods Programme (NHFN), Home Purchase Scheme,
Converting Spaces programmes and the Homes for the City of Brighton
& Hove Joint Venture.
11.11 Work will
continue through 2025/26 to deliver housing supply pipeline
schemes. The Home Purchase Scheme will continue to explore
opportunities to buy back ex-right-to-buy properties, whilst the
extended Home Purchase Scheme will look at off the shelf purchase
opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing within
the HRA. The NHFN Programme is a longer term approach to the
delivery of new homes; work will continue on approved projects and
to bring forward new projects for consideration by Cabinet.
12.1
The Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) is a ring-fenced grant that
provides funding for Schools, Academies, Early Years, Special
Educational Needs and a small number of allowable Central
items.
12.2
Similarly to the HRA, the development and setting of schools’
budgets follows a separate process involving statutory consultation
and oversight of the Schools Forum. However, there are links with
the General Fund budget setting process as General Fund budget
proposals and savings can potentially impact schools and vice
versa.
12.3
The DSG is divided into four blocks – the Schools Block, the
High Needs Block (HNB), the Central School Services Block (which
allocates funding to local authorities for their ongoing
responsibilities towards both maintained schools and academies),
and the Early Years Block. Each of the four blocks of the DSG are
determined by separate national funding formulae (NFF).
12.4
On 18th December 2024 the DfE published initial DSG allocations for
2025/26. These are summarised in the table below, together with
comparisons to the 2024/25 allocations:
Financial
Year
|
Schools
Block
£’000
|
Central
School
Services
Block
£’000
|
High Needs
Block
£’000
|
Early
Years Block
£’000
|
Total
DSG
£’000
|
2025/26
|
176,362
|
2,277
|
41,979
|
41,079
|
261,697
|
2024/25
|
165,039
|
2,091
|
39,332
|
27,351
|
233,813
|
Increase
|
11,324
|
186
|
2,647
|
13,727
|
27,884
|
Whilst funding allocations across all
blocks have increased in 2025/26 it is difficult to draw direct
comparisons with the prior year due to changes in accounting
arrangements, particularly within the Schools Block. For 2025/26, a
number of former specific grants are being rolled into core Schools
block funding (these equated to approximately £9.4m in
2024/25) meaning the true increase in Schools block funding is
significantly lower than the £11.324m shown in the table
above.
12.5
As set out in the paragraph above there are significant
presentational changes to the way mainstream schools are being
allocated funding in 2025/26. Once these changes are allowed for
the level of increase in funding to schools is estimated to only be
between 0.5% and 1% for 2025/26. As funding to schools is
pupil-led, schools with falling rolls are likely to be faced with a
very challenging budget allocation for 2025/26, in the context of
unavoidable cost pressures such as pay award increases. The
government has advised there will be an affordability assessment to
consider the impact of pay awards for both teachers and support
staff in 2025/26.
12.6
It should be noted that the Schools Block pupil numbers have
decreased from 28,972 in October 2023 to 28,545 in October 2024.
This is a reduction of 427 pupils and equates to an overall loss of
DSG Schools Block funding to the local authority of c.
£2.03m.
12.7
School carry forwards at the end of 2023/24 were £0.281m (net
surplus), a reduction of £4.259m from the £4.540m
balance at the end of 2022/23. Forecasts for the end of the 2024/25
financial year suggest that the school balances position will move
to a net deficit of approximately £5.5m. This is a key
indicator of the financial challenges being experienced across all
phases.
Schools
Balances
|
Nursery
£’000
|
Primary
£’000
|
Secondary
£’000
|
Special
£’000
|
Total
£’000
|
Final 2022/23
balances
|
-81
|
1,185
|
3,573
|
-137
|
4,540
|
Final 2023/24
balances
|
24
|
-1,143
|
2,048
|
-648
|
281
|
Movement
|
105
|
-2,328
|
-1,525
|
-511
|
-4,259
|
School Budget Plans 2025/26
12.8
Schools are required to submit draft budget plans for 2025/26 by
the end of February 2025. At that stage there should be a clear
indication of the likely budget position of schools for the 2025/26
financial year. However, it is anticipated, there will be further
pressure in terms of schools’ budgets and license deficit
requirements in 2025/26. Current deficits are running at between
£6m to £7m which clearly exceeds the level of school
balances. This will therefore require cashflow management until
deficits are addressed. Additional resources have been provided to
Education and Finance to work with schools to assist them in
addressing financial challenges alongside other advisory support
such as DfE accredited Schools Resource Management Advisers
(SRMA).
12.9
The headline allocation of High Needs Block funding for 2025/26 is
shown in the table above. The government increase in funding of c.
£2.6m (6.8%) is more favourable than in 2024/25 but is still
below the level of the demand and cost pressures the council is
experiencing, and initial forecasts show a potential in-year
deficit in the 2025/26 high needs block of approximately
£1.7m.
12.10 The council
continues to seek to provide additional local specialist provision
linked to the SEN Sufficiency Strategy, however, costs associated
with the establishment of this are high.
12.11 Under current
national legislation a statutory override mechanism is place which
allows local authorities to keep DSG deficits separate from the
General Fund budget, however this statutory override arrangement is
due to expire in March 2026. The latest published data shows that
approximately 107 out of 149 local authorities are operating with
deficits against the high needs block of their DSG
allocations.
12.12 There are
further extensions to free entitlement in 2025/26 resulting in a
large increase to Early Years Block funding. For 2025/26 the main
early years entitlements are:
·
the 15 hours entitlement for eligible working parents of children
from the age of nine months;
·
the additional (expanded) 15 hours entitlement for eligible working
parents of children from the age of nine months from September
2025;
·
the 15 hours entitlement for disadvantaged two-year-olds;
·
the universal 15 hours entitlement for all three and
four-year-olds;
·
the additional 15 hours entitlement for eligible working parents of
three and four-year-olds.
12.13 Government
funding rates are increasing for 2025/26 and there is a requirement
for the local authority to pass on a minimum of 96% Early Years
Block funding to providers. It is anticipated that the Early Years
Block will be in breakeven position in the 2025/26 financial
year.
12.14 The 2025/26 DSG
settlement currently includes no information regarding funding for
the increase in Employers’ National Insurance contributions.
For schools and other areas within the DSG it is expected that this
will be provided as a separate grant, over and above the core DSG
funding. Further details are due to be published by government
regarding the arrangements of this grant in due course.
13.1
The Medium Term Financial Strategy of a large public sector
organisation with many demand-led services and complex, uncertain
funding streams will always contain significant and varying degrees
of risk. The cost of living crisis, higher inflation and higher
interest rates have significantly impacted the council’s
expenditure and income throughout 2023/24 and continues into
2024/25. This includes higher than anticipated pay awards, higher
costs of social care, impacts on fees & charges due to economic
conditions, continued high levels of Council Tax Reduction
claimants (i.e. taxation losses), and continued high levels of
support for homelessness.
13.2
These pressures have resulted in current forecast overspends
in-year requiring ongoing recruitment and spending controls to help
mitigate the financial position alongside other financial recovery
measures. This highlights the need to recognise the financial risks
of unexpected events and the impact this has on the resilience of
the authority.
13.3
The pressures experienced in recent years, including increases in
the cost of living, may continue well into the medium term given
the growth in Education, Health & Care Plans (EHCPs), growing
Learning Disability demands, a national obesity crisis, and the
national and local challenges in tackling housing demand. To assist
with the cost of living, for businesses the government has provided
ongoing Business Rates reliefs to help certain sectors, whilst for
individuals, the government is providing additional funding through
the Household Support Fund. However, business rate reliefs are
reducing in 2025/26 and the Household Support Fund is at a lower
level than previously. The corollary is that current predictions
indicate that the council will not only need to make substantial
savings in 2025/26 but also over the MTFS period.
13.4
The new government announced a one-year settlement for 2025/26 on
18 December 2024 with no information for 2025/26 onwards, however,
the government has indicated that multi-year settlements will be
announced in Spring 2025.
13.5
In general, other factors that can have a material effect on the
medium term financial position of an authority include:
·
The lack of certainty in future resource levels;
·
Changes in function and/or funding;
·
Changes in the economy including the impact on business rates
income and/or Council Tax Reduction claimant numbers or collection
rates;
·
Similarly, impacts on the levels of house building which affects
both Council Tax and New Homes Bonus or a successor mechanism;
·
The level of future successful appeals against the business rating
list;
·
Changes in employer costs e.g. pension or national insurance
changes;
·
Achievement of performance targets for performance related grant or
partnership funding;
·
Delivery and achievement of savings and transformation
programmes;
·
Ability to manage identified demand-led service pressures;
·
Decisions on council tax increases and the council tax reduction
scheme;
·
Democratic support for change including partnership working,
integration or devolution.
13.6
Risks to the MTFS arise from both external and internal factors.
External risks include, for example, government policy decisions
that can have positive or negative impacts on costs or national or
local economic conditions that can affect income sources up or
down. External risks are generally the most difficult to manage or
plan for.
13.7
Internal risks can also arise for a number of reasons, such as cost
overruns, underachievement of savings plans, changing priorities or
ineffective systems of demand management. They may also be
influenced by external factors. It is vital to have adequate
mechanisms to manage internal risks if financial stability is to be
achieved. There are a number of ways in which the effects of risks
can be managed and these are set out in the following risk table.
Furthermore, the council’s MTFS, by taking a longer term
planning approach, aims to minimise the impact of some of the major
financial risks and the impact on investment in support of the
council’s priorities.
13.8
The forecasts within the MTFS are based on prudential assumptions
that reflect the most likely position based on current knowledge
and data. There are therefore risks of over or under stating
expenditure or income estimates which have been considered.
13.9
The identified risks are scored for Likelihood (L) and Impact (I).
The scores are multiplied to give a resulting risk score. The
key to the scores is given in Annex
B together with assessed Risk Scores for identified
risks, including the potential financial sensitivity.
Balance
|
Estimated
Balance as at 01/04/25 £'000
|
Planned
Use 2025/26 £'000
|
Estimated
Balance as at 31/03/26 £'000
|
Review
Process
|
Conclusion
|
|
General Fund
Reserves
|
General Fund
Working Balance/General Reserves
|
6,749
|
1,125
|
7,874
|
Reviewed
against the register of financial risks, taking into account the
requirements of the Local Government Act 2003.
|
A
minimum working balance of £9.000m is recommended by the
Chief Finance Officer in accordance with the requirements of
Section 25 of the Local Government Act 2003. The Working Balance is
being replenished over three years with the final repayment due in
2026/27. The report highlights that a reprofiling of the 2024/25
repayment may be required to assist the in-year position, which
would reduce the bought forward balance to
£5.625m.
|
|
Library PFI
Reserve
|
660
|
-143
|
517
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Use
for funding the project over the lifetime of the PFI scheme.
Expected to be increased contributions from reserves, due to
inflationary pressures. Contributions to the reserve may be
required in future years.
|
|
Waste PFI
Project Reserve
|
7,932
|
-1,227
|
6,705
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Use
for funding the project over the lifetime of the PFI. This reserve
has been used to fund the Term Time only costs and will be
replenished in time to meet existing Waste PFI
commitments.
|
|
Section 106
Receipts (Revenue)
|
320
|
0
|
320
|
Reviewed
throughout the year to reflect agreed liabilities and new
agreements.
|
Retain for
specified purpose.
|
|
Developer
Contributions Unapplied (S106 Capital)
|
171
|
0
|
171
|
Reviewed
throughout the year to reflect agreed liabilities and new
agreements.
|
Retain for
specified purpose.
|
|
ICT
Investment Reserve
|
472
|
-230
|
242
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Held to support
planned IT&D expenditure over the next two years.
|
|
Winter
Maintenance
|
500
|
0
|
500
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Held to fund
exceptional costs of extreme weather.
|
|
Dome Planned
Maintenance
|
178
|
0
|
178
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain -
subject to lease agreement with Brighton Dome & Festival
Society.
|
|
Hove Park 3G
Pitch Renewal
|
15
|
0
|
15
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Held to replace
pitch at the end of its useful life. Timing to be
confirmed.
|
|
Surface Water
Management Reserve
|
382
|
39
|
421
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain to
support planned SWMP related works, emergency work and to
contribute to any carbon neutral opportunities.
This reserve is retained to meet our statutory obligations as the
Lead Local Flood Authority.
|
|
Sports
Facilities Reserve
|
549
|
-200
|
349
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain to
support Sports Facilities.
|
|
Licensing -
other reserve
|
8
|
-8
|
0
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain for
specified purpose - to fund potential future deficits or repayment
to licensees. Reserve smooths out fluctuations in volumes of
licences issued each year.
|
|
Taxi
Licensing
|
41
|
-20
|
21
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain for
specified purpose - to fund potential future deficits or repayment
to licensees. This smooths out fluctuations in volumes of licences
issued each year.
|
|
Trading
Standards Seized Goods
|
7
|
0
|
7
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain for
specified purpose - to fund potential repayments.
|
|
Stanmer Park
Parking Surplus
|
250
|
0
|
250
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Ringfenced to
support expenditure on Stanmer Park as part of the Heritage Lottery
funding agreement.
|
|
East Brighton
Parking Surplus
|
70
|
0
|
70
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain to
support expenditure on East Brighton Park.
|
|
Preston Park
Parking Surplus
|
360
|
0
|
360
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain to
support expenditure on Preston Park.
|
|
Overdown Rise
Footpath Maintenance
|
20
|
0
|
20
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Hold for future
years maintenance costs of the foot path at Overdown
Rise
|
|
HMO
Licensing Fees Reserve
|
492
|
-78
|
414
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain to
support annual inspections of HMO licenses - this is a statutory
function
|
|
Phoenix House
Sinking Fund
|
60
|
-60
|
0
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Tenants
contributions to be retained for maintenance requirements at
Phoenix House.
|
|
Damage Deposit
Guarantee Scheme
|
94
|
0
|
94
|
Reviewed during
the year as part of budget monitoring process
|
Retained for
specific purpose but required level will continue to be
reviewed.
|
|
RP&M Trust
Sinking Fund
|
210
|
0
|
210
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Retain -
subject to lease agreement with RPMT
|
|
Travellers Site
Capital Reserve
|
79
|
-79
|
0
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Contribution
each year to reserves for future major works costs of the
Travellers site.
|
|
Restructure
Redundancy Reserve
|
126
|
0
|
126
|
As
part of closure of accounts.
|
Restructure
& Redundancy costs are funded within the capital programme as
part of the capitalisation direction.
|
|
CIL
- Neighbourhood reserve
|
612
|
0
|
612
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Allocations
from the Neighbourhood Reserve will be made in accordance with the
agreed process which involves ward councillors.
|
|
CIL
- Strategic reserve
|
1,565
|
-184
|
1,381
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Allocations
from the Strategic reserve will be made in line with the strategic
objectives set out in the initial scheme and will be approved by
Cabinet.
|
|
Total General
Fund Reserves
|
21,922
|
-1,065
|
20,857
|
|
|
|
Schools / DSG
Reserves
|
Schools LMS
Balances
|
-5,500
|
0
|
-5,500
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Balances are
held by school governing bodies. Position unclear for future
years.
|
|
Total Schools /
DSG Reserves
|
-5,500
|
0
|
-5,500
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
RESERVES
|
16,422
|
-1,065
|
15,357
|
|
|
|
General Fund
Provisions
|
Hostel
Accommodation Dilapidations
|
82
|
0
|
82
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
Held for
dilapidation costs for West Pier Hostel following retendering of
service.
|
|
10
Year lease revenue costs Provision
|
75
|
0
|
75
|
Review of
annual contribution to this provision at closedown.
|
This is
required to pay back the borrowing costs when 10 year leases finish
in 2032/33.These are 30 properties leased through Rough Sleeping
Accommodation Programme partly funded by DLUHC.
|
|
Voluntary
Severance Provision
|
600
|
-600
|
0
|
Following
closure of accounts.
|
To
fund cost of potential severance agreements from 2025/26 Budget
plans.
|
|
Insurance
Provision
|
3,871
|
0
|
3,871
|
The
Insurance Fund is subject to a bi-annual health check by the
actuaries. The last health check was completed in March
2023.
|
The
level of the Insurance Provision will be adjusted in line with the
recommendations of the next actuary report due in March
2025.
|
|
Total General
Fund Provisions
|
4,628
|
-600
|
4,028
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ALL
FUNDS
|
21,050
|
-1,665
|
19,385
|
|
|
|
Risk Scoring Key:
Likelihood (L)
(of
occurrence):
|
1
– Almost impossible
2
– Unlikely
3
– Possible
4
– Likely
5
– Almost certain
|
Impact (I):
|
1
– Insignificant
2
– Minor
3
– Moderate
4
– Major
5
– Catastrophic or fantastic
|
Risk Score (L) x (I):
(Overall
rating)
|
1 to
3 Low
4 to
7 Moderate
8 to
14 Significant
15 to
25 High
|
Risk
|
Likeli-hood
(L)
|
Impact / Sensitivity
(I)
|
Risk =
(L) x (I)
|
Possible Impact on Financial Strategy
|
Mitigation / Management
|
Council Tax base is lower than anticipated e.g. higher caseload for
CTRS (Council Tax Reduction Scheme) discounts /lower number of new
properties / more student exempt properties / more SMI exemptions /
more discounts awarded, resulting in a deficit on the collection
fund
|
3
|
3
0.1% reduction in council tax base = £0.198m
|
9
|
Would require reductions in budgets (increased savings) for the
following year
|
Close monitoring of the collection fund and checking validity of
exemptions and discounts particularly new property developments,
student numbers, CTRS discounts and empty property
discounts.
|
Collection of council tax, including CTRS claimants, falls due to
its impact on household budgets alongside other Welfare Reform
impacts, resulting in a deficit on the collection fund
|
3
|
3
0.1% reduction in council tax collection = £0.198m
|
9
|
Would
require reductions in the budget (increased savings) for the
following year
|
Close
monitoring of the collection fund, including claimants under CTRS.
Appropriate communications, advice (linked to Welfare Reform advice
services) and collection strategies have been agreed to minimise
impact.
|
Services fail to operate within set budgets due to increased
service demands or weak systems of demand management
|
3
|
4
1%
gross expenditure on demand led budgets = £3.1m
|
12
|
Excess service pressures would have to be met through additional
resources, such as reserves, or through unplanned savings having to
be made elsewhere. Possible need for emergency spending and/or
recruitment restrictions with potential impacts on service delivery
and quality. Reduction in reserves / working balance.
|
Close monitoring and analysis of demand-led budgets and overall
budget through budget monitoring (TBM).
Identify action plans to mitigate cost pressures.
Strategic MTFS investments provided for ASC, Children’s
Social Care and Homelessness demand-led pressure areas.
|
Services fail to operate within set budgets due to unachievable
income or poor collection performance
|
3
|
3
1%
of fees and charges income = £1.2m
|
9
|
Income pressures that can only be met through additional resources,
such as using reserves, or savings being made elsewhere in the
budget. Possible need for emergency spending and/or recruitment
restrictions with potential impacts on service delivery and
quality.
Reduction in reserves / working balance.
|
Monitoring of income budgets and collection performance (rates)
through TBM reporting. Identify action plans to mitigate
unachievable income, price variations and exceptional legal
costs.
In-year review of charging policy and revised charges approved if
absolutely necessary.
Internal Audit review of services where appropriate.
|
Services fail to operate within set budgets due to increased labour
or supply chain costs, contract price variations or other
inflationary impacts
|
4
|
4
1%
gross expenditure = £5.2m
|
16
|
Excess costs would have to be met through additional resources,
such as reserves, or through unplanned savings having to be made
elsewhere. Possible need for emergency spending and/or recruitment
restrictions with potential impacts on service delivery and
quality. Reduction in reserves / working balance.
|
Close monitoring of budgets and overall spend through budget
monitoring (TBM).
Identify Financial Recovery action plans to mitigate specific areas
experiencing cost pressures.
Focus contract management resources to areas of concern.
Financial management controls such as vacancy management and
additional spending controls.
|
Services fail to operate within set budgets due to unachievable
savings arising from:
-
Over-estimate of the savings potential;
-
Higher than estimated costs to implement the savings
opportunity.
|
3
|
3
5%
of GF savings = £1.2m
|
9
|
Overspending that can only be met from additional resources such as
reserves or savings being made elsewhere in the budget. Possible
need for emergency spending and/or recruitment restrictions with
potential impacts on service delivery and quality. Reduction in
reserves / working balance.
|
Monitor savings through TBM and identify action plans and/or
alternative measures to mitigate the unachievable
savings.
Potentially refer back to members for decisions on alternative
savings proposals where these are significant or cannot be
mitigated elsewhere.
|
Pay assumptions are lower than finally agreed pay awards and other
pay related costs.
|
3
|
3
0.5%
change in
pay award
=
£0.8m for the General Fund
|
9
|
Pay award pressures can only be met through additional resources,
such as reserves, or savings being made elsewhere in the budget.
Possible need for emergency spending and/or recruitment
restrictions with potential impacts on service delivery and
quality. Reduction in reserves / working balance.
|
Monitor progress on pay award negotiations and wider national
settlements.
Lobby government for more funding if nationally negotiated pay
awards are significantly higher than local or national assumptions
(e.g. Spending Review assumptions).
Excess pay award costs need to be addressed in-year through
financial management controls and then built into budget planning
(MTFS) for future years.
|
PFI Waste tonnages higher than projected resulting in additional
disposal costs
|
2
|
3
1%
increase in tonnage per annum = £0.2m p.a. over life of PFI
contract
|
6
|
Would increase the waste disposal budget and compensating savings
would need to be identified elsewhere in the budget.
|
Provision (contingency) for higher tonnages made in the assessment
of the waste PFI reserve for future years.
Monitor and identify specific areas of growth and undertake waste
minimisation and further recycling measures.
Trends are monitored and reflected in the MTFS for future
years.
|
Inflation continues to impact on contracted social care provider
costs
|
4
|
4
1%
increase in contract prices = £1.8m
|
16
|
Excess costs would have to be met through additional resources,
such as reserves, or through unplanned savings having to be made
elsewhere. Possible need for emergency spending and/or recruitment
restrictions with potential impacts on service delivery and
quality. Reduction in reserves / working balance.
|
Identify Financial Recovery action plans to mitigate specific areas
experiencing cost pressures.
Focus contract management resources to areas of concern.
Consider financial management controls such as vacancy management
and additional spending controls.
|
The uncertainties within the housing market, changes in housing
benefit and welfare reform, or ongoing impacts of the cost of
living crisis create spending pressures within the budget e.g.
homelessness
|
4
|
3
10%
increase in net temporary accommodation and rough sleeping budget =
£1.3m
|
12
|
Would create additional pressures in the Housing Strategy and
potentially other related budgets which would need to find
compensating savings.
|
Continue to assess and monitor the potential impact of changes to
the welfare benefit system and plan and respond to government
consultations accordingly. Lobby Government for additional
funding.
|
Increased property related insurance premiums as a result of
national or international storm damage claims over the longer
term
|
3
|
2
10% further increase = £0.3m
|
6
|
Would require compensating savings to be identified in 2025/26 and
future years.
|
Insurance premiums have been retendered and are reviewed annually.
Budget has planned increases in 2025/26 as price increases
are expected.
Continued emphasis on risk management to help prevent future
claims.
|
Major civil incident occurs e.g. storm, flooding, riot
|
2
|
3
Estimated “Bellwin” threshold = £0.5m
|
6
|
|
Ensure appropriate insurance cover is in place and that the
Insurance Fund is sufficient to cover uninsured risks.
|
Severe winter weather places additional spending pressures on
winter maintenance and other budgets across the council
|
2
|
3
Depends on severity of weather event
|
6
|
|
|
Cost overruns occur on schemes in the agreed capital
programme
|
3
|
2
1%
cost overrun on total 2024/25 programme =
£2.1m
|
6
|
|
|
Capital receipts lower than anticipated
|
3
|
3
10%
reduction in planned 2024/25 receipts = £1.6m
|
9
|
|
|
Income from business rates is lower than expected due to successful
rating appeals / higher levels of relief awarded / redevelopment of
existing sites gives temporary reduction / collection performance
declines
|
|
3
1% of forecast retained business rates income =
£0.9m
|
9
|
|
|